Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May-Jun;35 Suppl 2(0 2):S235-46.
doi: 10.1097/BCR.0000000000000076.

Predicting resource utilization in burn treatment

Affiliations

Predicting resource utilization in burn treatment

Sandra Taylor et al. J Burn Care Res. 2014 May-Jun.
No abstract available

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicts of Interest and Sources of Funding

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Predicted probability of at least one operation (A) and at least one operating room visit (B) The proportion of the burn that was full thickness was fixed at 50% and no inhalation injury was assumed.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Predicted number of operations with (A) and without (B) inhalation injury and predicted number of operating room visits with (C) and without (D) inhalation injury. The proportion of the burn that was full thickness was fixed at 50%.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Predicted versus observed number of patients receiving 1 to 9 operative procedures (A & B) and number of patients with 1 to 9 total operating room visits (C & D) for the training and test sets. Error bars are 95% confidence limits derived from bootstrap resampling. Asterisks indicate observed values for the training and test sets.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Predicted probability of at least one day in ICU without (A) and with (B) inhalation injury and predicted probability of at least one day on a ventilator without (C) and with (D) inhalation injury. The proportion of the burn that was full thickness was fixed at 50%.
Figure 5
Figure 5
Predicted length of ICU stay (days) without (A) and with (B) inhalation injury and predicted number of ventilator days without (C) and with (D) inhalation injury. The proportion of the burn that was full thickness was fixed at 50%.
Figure 6
Figure 6
Predicted versus observed number of patients in intensive care for 1 to 9 days (A & B) and on a ventilator for 1 to 9 days (C & D) for the training and test sets. Error bars are 95% confidence limits derived from bootstrap resampling. Asterisks indicate observed values for the training and test sets.

References

    1. Atiyeh B, Gunn S, William A, Dibo S. Primary triage of mass burn casualties with associated severe traumatic injuries. Annals of burns and Fire Disasters. 2013;26:48–52. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Taylor SL, Lee D, Nagler T, Lawless MB, et al. A validity review of the National Burn Repository. J Burn Care Res. 2012;34:274–280. et al. A validity review of the National Burn Repository. J Burn Care Res. 2013; 34: 274–80. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Mullahy J. Specification and testing of some modified count data models. Journal of Econometrics. 1986;33:341–365.
    1. Rose CE, et al. On the use of zero-inflated and hurdle models for modeling vaccine adverse event count data. J Biopharm Stat. 2006;16:463–481. - PubMed
    1. R Core Team. R: A language and environment for statistical computing. Vienna, Austria: R Foundation for Statistical Computing; 2013. URL http://www.R-project.org/

Publication types

MeSH terms