Normal and regenerating optic fibers in goldfish tectum: HRP-EM evidence for rapid synaptogenesis and optic fiber-fiber affinity
- PMID: 2464622
- DOI: 10.1002/cne.902740404
Normal and regenerating optic fibers in goldfish tectum: HRP-EM evidence for rapid synaptogenesis and optic fiber-fiber affinity
Abstract
The distribution of normal and regenerating retinal fibers and synapses was studied on tectum in goldfish by light (LM) and electron microscopy (EM). Since labeling of the early regenerating fibers was previously reported to be difficult, a new 'cold-fill' HRP labeling protocol was developed, which labeled regenerating optic fibers and terminals on tectum as early as 14 days after nerve crush when they first arrive on tectum. In order to characterize the laminar distribution of optic afferents in normal fish and in fish regenerating for 14-240 days, EM photomontages of areas 14 microns wide by 160 microns deep through the HRP-labeled primary optic innervation layer (S-SO-SFGS) were constructed. The time points in regeneration that were examined spanned the period in which others have shown that an initially diffuse retinotopic map becomes spatially restricted. At the LM level regenerating optic fibers were restricted to the optic lamina. They reinnervated tectum in an anterior to posterior sequence as previously seen with autoradiography. In addition, at 14 days, some "pioneer" optic fascicles were found to have already grown to posterior tectum where they gave rise to branches with boutonlike terminations and growth-cone-like processes. Form the ultrastructural analysis it was clear that optic fibers and terminals observed strict laminar boundaries as they partitioned themselves in the optic laminae (S, SO and SFGS) in both normal and regenerating fish. The behavior of optic fibers was lamina specific with respect to synapse formation and the orientation of fiber outgrowth. As early as 14 days regeneration, optic fibers made synapses onto the four types of postsynaptic profiles observed in normal fish. Numerous optic terminals were labeled at 14 days, and there appeared to be no waiting period between fiber ingrowth to the SO and synapse formation in the S and SFGS. At 14-60 days, atypical synaptic contacts which appear to be nascent synapses were made by labeled optic fibers in fascicles and by growth-cone-like processes. By 21-30 days, the density of optic terminals was high and there were many more fasciculated optic fibers in the SFGS than normal as late as 350 days. These findings suggest that optic fiber lamination is highly constrained by tectal cues, that fibers rapidly regenerate many synaptic terminals before retinotopic map refinement is complete, and that fibers have a strong affinity for each other.
Similar articles
-
Optic synapse number but not density is constrained during regeneration onto surgically halved tectum in goldfish: HRP-EM evidence that optic fibers compete for fixed numbers of postsynaptic sites on the tectum.J Comp Neurol. 1988 Aug 22;274(4):539-59. doi: 10.1002/cne.902740405. J Comp Neurol. 1988. PMID: 2464623
-
A comparison of the normal and regenerated retinotectal pathways of goldfish.J Comp Neurol. 1984 Feb 10;223(1):57-76. doi: 10.1002/cne.902230106. J Comp Neurol. 1984. PMID: 6200514
-
Normal activity-dependent refinement in a compressed retinotectal projection in goldfish.J Comp Neurol. 1994 Sep 22;347(4):481-94. doi: 10.1002/cne.903470402. J Comp Neurol. 1994. PMID: 7529264
-
Functional anatomy of the tectum mesencephali of the goldfish. An explorative analysis of the functional implications of the laminar structural organization of the tectum.Brain Res. 1983 Dec;287(3):247-97. doi: 10.1016/0165-0173(83)90008-5. Brain Res. 1983. PMID: 6362772 Review.
-
Morphogenetics as an alternative to chemospecificity in the formation of nerve connections. A review of literature, before 1978, concerning the control of growth of regenerating optic nerve fibres to specific locations in the optic tectum and a new interpretation based on contact guidance.Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1978;32:275-358. Symp Soc Exp Biol. 1978. PMID: 382425 Review. No abstract available.
Cited by
-
Spontaneous retinal activity is tonic and does not drive tectal activity during activity-dependent refinement in regeneration.J Neurosci. 2002 Apr 1;22(7):2626-36. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.22-07-02626.2002. J Neurosci. 2002. PMID: 11923428 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Research Materials