Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 17;17(1):18898.
doi: 10.7448/IAS.17.1.18898. eCollection 2014.

Could you have said no? A mixed-methods investigation of consent to HIV tests in four African countries

Carla Makhlouf Obermeyer  1 , Cairn Verhulst  2 , Khalil Asmar  3 ; MATCH study group
Affiliations

Could you have said no? A mixed-methods investigation of consent to HIV tests in four African countries

Carla Makhlouf Obermeyer et al. J Int AIDS Soc. .

Abstract

Introduction: Although most studies report high frequencies of consent to HIV tests, critics argue that clients are subject to pressure, that acceptors later indicate they could not have refused, and that provider-initiated HIV testing raises serious ethical issues. We examine the meaning of consent and why clients think they could not have refused.

Methods: Clients in Burkina Faso, Kenya, Malawi and Uganda were asked about consenting to HIV tests, whether they thought they could have refused and why. Textual responses were analyzed using qualitative and statistical methods.

Results: Among 926 respondents, 77% reported they could not have said no, but in fact, 60% actively consented to test, 24% had no objection and only 7% tested without consent. There were few significant associations between categories of consent and their covariates.

Conclusions: Retrospectively asking clients if they could have refused to test for HIV overestimates coercion. Triangulating qualitative and quantitative data suggests a considerable degree of agency.

Keywords: Consent; HIV; ethics; qualitative; sub-Saharan Africa; testing.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Bayer R, Fairchild AL. Changing the paradigm for HIV testing – the end of exceptionalism. N Engl J Med. 2006;355:647–9. - PubMed
    1. Gruskin S, Ahmed S, Ferguson L. Provider-initiated HIV testing and counselling in health facilities – what does this mean for the health and human rights of pregnant women? Dev World Bioeth. 2008;8:23–32. - PubMed
    1. Jürgens R. Increasing access to HIV testing and counselling while respecting human rights – background paper. New York: Public Health Program of the Open Society Institute; 2007. - PubMed
    1. Obermeyer C. Makhlouf, Osborn M. The uptake of testing and counseling for HIV: a review of the social and behavioral evidence. Am J Public Health. 2007;97(10):1762–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Baggaley R, Hensen B, Ajose O, Grabbe KL, Wong VJ, Schilsky A, et al. From caution to urgency: the evolution of HIV testing and counselling in Africa. Bull World Health Organ. 2012;90:652–8B. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources