Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Clinical Trial
. 2014 Nov;66(5):815-25.
doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2014.02.056. Epub 2014 Mar 6.

Updated interim efficacy analysis and long-term safety of abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients without prior chemotherapy (COU-AA-302)

Affiliations
Clinical Trial

Updated interim efficacy analysis and long-term safety of abiraterone acetate in metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer patients without prior chemotherapy (COU-AA-302)

Dana E Rathkopf et al. Eur Urol. 2014 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Abiraterone acetate (an androgen biosynthesis inhibitor) plus prednisone is approved for treating patients with metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer (mCRPC). Study COU-AA-302 evaluated abiraterone acetate plus prednisone versus prednisone alone in mildly symptomatic or asymptomatic patients with progressive mCRPC without prior chemotherapy.

Objective: Report the prespecified third interim analysis (IA) of efficacy and safety outcomes in study COU-AA-302.

Design, setting, and participants: Study COU-AA-302, a double-blind placebo-controlled study, enrolled patients with mCRPC from April 2009 to June 2010. A total of 1088 patients were stratified by Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group performance status (0 vs 1).

Intervention: Patients were randomised 1:1 to abiraterone 1000mg plus prednisone 5mg twice daily by mouth versus prednisone.

Outcome measurements and statistical analysis: Co-primary end points were radiographic progression-free survival (rPFS) and overall survival (OS). Median times to event outcomes were estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method. Hazard ratios (HRs) and 95% confidence intervals (CIs) were derived using the Cox model, and treatment comparison used the log-rank test. The O'Brien-Fleming Lan-DeMets α-spending function was used for OS. Adverse events were summarised descriptively.

Results and limitations: With a median follow-up duration of 27.1 mo, improvement in rPFS was statistically significant with abiraterone treatment versus prednisone (median: 16.5 vs 8.2 mo; HR: 0.52 [95% CI, 0.45-0.61]; p<0.0001). Abiraterone improved OS (median: 35.3 vs 30.1 mo; HR: 0.79 [95% CI, 0.66-0.95]; p=0.0151) but did not reach the prespecified statistical efficacy boundary (α-level: 0.0035). A post hoc multivariate analysis for OS using known prognostic factors supported the primary results (HR: 0.74 [95% CI, 0.61-0.89]; p=0.0017), and all clinically relevant secondary end points and patient-reported outcomes improved. While the post hoc nature of the long-term safety analysis is a limitation, the safety profile with longer treatment exposure was consistent with prior reports.

Conclusions: The updated IA of study COU-AA-302 in patients with mCRPC without prior chemotherapy confirms that abiraterone delays disease progression, pain, and functional deterioration and has clinical benefit with a favourable safety profile, including in patients treated for ≥24 mo.

Trial registration: Study COU-AA-302, ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00887198.

Patient summary: The updated results of this ongoing study showed that disease progression was delayed in patients with advanced prostate cancer who were treated with abiraterone acetate and prednisone, and there was a continued trend in prolongation of life compared with patients treated with prednisone alone. Treatment with abiraterone acetate and prednisone was well tolerated by patients who were treated for >2 yr.

Keywords: Abiraterone acetate; Chemotherapy-naive; Efficacy; Metastatic castration-resistant prostate cancer; Safety.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Co–primary end point: (a,b) radiographic progression-free survival assessed by investigator review at prespecified interim analysis. (b) The size of the circle reflects the number of patients affected. For hazard ratio (HR) <1, the result favours abiraterone. AA = abiraterone; ALK-P = alkaline phosphatase; BPI = Brief Pain Inventory; CI = confidence interval; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; N.A. = North America; P = prednisone; PSA = prostate-specific antigen.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Co–primary end point: (a,b) overall survival. Prespecified significance level by the O’Brien-Fleming boundary = 0.0035. (b) The size of circle reflects the number of patients affected. For hazard ratio (HR) <1, the result favours abiraterone. AA = abiraterone; ALK-P = alkaline phosphatase; BPI = Brief Pain Inventory; CI = confidence interval; ECOG = Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group; LDH = lactate dehydrogenase; N.A. = North America; NE = not estimable; P = prednisone; PSA = prostate-specific antigen.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Secondary end points: (a) time to opiate use for cancer-related pain; (b) time to initiation of chemotherapy; (c) time to deterioration in the Eastern Cooperative Oncology Group (ECOG) score; (d) time to prostate-specific antigen (PSA) progression. AA = abiraterone; CI = confidence interval; HR = hazard ratio; NR = not reached; P = prednisone.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Maximal prostate-specific antigen (PSA) decline from baseline. A negative percentage indicates a decline in PSA. A positive percentage indicates that the patient never has a decline in PSA.

Comment in

References

    1. Heidenreich A, Bastian PJ, Bellmunt J, et al. EAU guidelines on prostate cancer, II: treatment of advanced, relapsing, and castration-resistant prostate cancer. Eur Urol. 2014;65:467–79. - PubMed
    1. National Comprehensive Cancer Network. NCCN clinical practice guidelines in oncology (NCCN guidelines) [Accessed May 28, 2013];Prostate cancer v. 2.2013. National Comprehensive Cancer Network Web site. http://www.nccn.org/professionals/physician_gls/pdf/prostate.pdf.
    1. Halabi S, Small EJ, Kantoff PW, et al. Prognostic model for predicting survival in men with hormone-refractory metastatic prostate cancer. J Clin Oncol. 2003;21:1232–7. - PubMed
    1. Tannock IF, de WR, Berry WR, et al. Docetaxel plus prednisone or mitoxantrone plus prednisone for advanced prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1502–12. - PubMed
    1. Petrylak DP, Tangen CM, Hussain MH, et al. Docetaxel and estramustine compared with mioxantrone and prednisone for advanced refractory prostate cancer. N Engl J Med. 2004;351:1513–20. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms

Associated data