Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2015 Apr;22(4):486-91.
doi: 10.1177/2047487314525529. Epub 2014 Mar 19.

Metabolic syndrome across Europe: different clusters of risk factors

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Metabolic syndrome across Europe: different clusters of risk factors

Angelo Scuteri et al. Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2015 Apr.

Abstract

Background: Metabolic syndrome (MetS) remains a controversial entity. Specific clusters of MetS components - rather than MetS per se - are associated with accelerated arterial ageing and with cardiovascular (CV) events. To investigate whether the distribution of clusters of MetS components differed cross-culturally, we studied 34,821 subjects from 12 cohorts from 10 European countries and one cohort from the USA in the MARE (Metabolic syndrome and Arteries REsearch) Consortium.

Methods: In accordance with the ATP III criteria, MetS was defined as an alteration three or more of the following five components: elevated glucose (G), fasting glucose ≥110 mg/dl; low HDL cholesterol, < 40mg/dl for men or <50 mg/dl for women; high triglycerides (T), ≥150 mg/dl; elevated blood pressure (B), ≥130/≥85 mmHg; abdominal obesity (W), waist circumference >102 cm for men or >88 cm for women.

Results: MetS had a 24.3% prevalence (8468 subjects: 23.9% in men vs. 24.6% in women, p < 0.001) with an age-associated increase in its prevalence in all the cohorts. The age-adjusted prevalence of the clusters of MetS components previously associated with greater arterial and CV burden differed across countries (p < 0.0001) and in men and women (p < 0.0001). In details, the cluster TBW was observed in 12% of the subjects with MetS, but was far more common in the cohorts from the UK (32.3%), Sardinia in Italy (19.6%), and Germany (18.5%) and less prevalent in the cohorts from Sweden (1.2%), Spain (2.6%), and the USA (2.5%). The cluster GBW accounted for 12.7% of subjects with MetS with higher occurrence in Southern Europe (Italy, Spain, and Portugal: 31.4, 18.4, and 17.1% respectively) and in Belgium (20.4%), than in Northern Europe (Germany, Sweden, and Lithuania: 7.6, 9.4, and 9.6% respectively).

Conclusions: The analysis of the distribution of MetS suggested that what follows under the common definition of MetS is not a unique entity rather a constellation of cluster of MetS components, likely selectively risky for CV disease, whose occurrence differs across countries.

Keywords: Blood pressure; Europe; HDL cholesterol; epidemiology; glucose; metabolic syndrome; triglycerides; waist circumference.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: None

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Age distribution (mean and SD) of subject enrolled in participating cohorts of the MARE Consortium
Figure 1
Figure 1
Age distribution (mean and SD) of subject enrolled in participating cohorts of the MARE Consortium
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall prevalence of MetS in different age groups (top panel),and diabetes mellitus in participating cohorts (middle panel); gender-specific prevalence of MetS in participating cohorts (bottom panel) of the MARE Consortium
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall prevalence of MetS in different age groups (top panel),and diabetes mellitus in participating cohorts (middle panel); gender-specific prevalence of MetS in participating cohorts (bottom panel) of the MARE Consortium
Figure 2
Figure 2
Overall prevalence of MetS in different age groups (top panel),and diabetes mellitus in participating cohorts (middle panel); gender-specific prevalence of MetS in participating cohorts (bottom panel) of the MARE Consortium
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of MetS components in subjects with MetS in participating cohorts of the MARE Consortium
Figure 3
Figure 3
Distribution of MetS components in subjects with MetS in participating cohorts of the MARE Consortium
Figure 4
Figure 4
Age-adjusted prevalence of clusters of MetS components in subjects with MetS in participating cohorts of the MARE Consortium: overall prevalence (top panel), men (middle panel), women (bottom panel).
Figure 4
Figure 4
Age-adjusted prevalence of clusters of MetS components in subjects with MetS in participating cohorts of the MARE Consortium: overall prevalence (top panel), men (middle panel), women (bottom panel).

References

    1. Reaven GM. The metabolic syndrome: requiescat in pace. Clin Chem. 2005;51:931–938. - PubMed
    1. Grundy SM. The metabolic syndrome still lives. Clin Chem. 2005;51:1352–1354. - PubMed
    1. Scuteri A, Najjar SS, Morrell CH, Lakatta EG. The metabolic syndrome in older individuals: prevalence and prediction of cardiovascular events: the Cardiovascular Health Study. Diabetes Care. 2005;28:882–887. - PubMed
    1. Mottillo S, Filion KB, Genest J, Joseph L, Pilote L, Poirier P, Rinfret S, Schiffrin EL, Eisenberg MJ. The metabolic syndrome and cardiovascular risk a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2010;56:1113–1132. - PubMed
    1. Kondo T, Osugi S, Shimokata K, Honjo H, Morita Y, Yamashita K, Maeda K, Muramatsu T, Shintani S, Matsushita K, Murohara T. Metabolic syndrome and all-cause mortality, cardiac events, and cardiovascular events: a follow-up study in 25,471 young- and middle-aged Japanese men. Eur J Cardiovasc Prev Rehabil. 2011;18:574–580. (2011) Epub 2011 Feb 14. - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms