Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 19;281(1782):20132127.
doi: 10.1098/rspb.2013.2127. Print 2014 May 7.

Neural signatures of betrayal aversion: an fMRI study of trust

Affiliations

Neural signatures of betrayal aversion: an fMRI study of trust

Jason A Aimone et al. Proc Biol Sci. .

Abstract

Decisions are said to be 'risky' when they are made in environments with uncertainty caused by nature. By contrast, a decision is said to be 'trusting' when its outcome depends on the uncertain decisions of another person. A rapidly expanding literature reveals economically important differences between risky and trusting decisions, and further suggests these differences are due to 'betrayal aversion'. While its neural foundations have not been previously illuminated, the prevailing hypothesis is that betrayal aversion stems from a desire to avoid negative emotions that arise from learning one's trust was betrayed. Here, we provide evidence from an fMRI study that supports this hypothesis. In particular, our data indicate that the anterior insula modulates trusting decisions that involve the possibility of betrayal.

Keywords: betrayal aversion; fMRI; trust.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
The experiment design.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
Frequency of trust by treatment and gender.
Figure 3.
Figure 3.
Brain areas displaying greater activation in the human than computer condition.
Figure 4.
Figure 4.
(a) Brain areas displaying greater activation when trusting than when not trusting (regardless of counterpart). (b) Level of insular activation by condition and choice.

References

    1. Fehr E. 2009. On the economics and biology of trust. J. Eur. Econ. Assoc. 7, 235–266 (doi:10.1162/JEEA.2009.7.2-3.235) - DOI
    1. Bohnet I, Zeckhauser R. 2004. Trust, risk and betrayal. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 55, 467–484 (doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2003.11.004) - DOI
    1. Bohnet I, Grieg F, Herrmann B, Zeckhauser R. 2008. Betrayal aversion: evidence from Brazil, China, Oman, Switzerland, Turkey, and the United States. Am. Econ. Rev. 98, 294–310 (doi:10.1257/aer.98.1.294) - DOI
    1. Houser D, Schunk D, Winter J. 2010. Distinguishing trust from risk: an anatomy of the investment game. J. Econ. Behav. Organ. 74, 72–81 (doi:10.1016/j.jebo.2010.01.002) - DOI
    1. Aimone JA, Houser D. 2011. Beneficial betrayal aversion. PLoS ONE 6, e17725 (doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0017725) - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources