Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 1:38:101-112.
doi: 10.1016/j.childyouth.2014.01.016.

An empirical typology of private child and family serving agencies

Emmeline Chuang  1 , Crystal Collins-Camargo  2 , Bowen McBeath  3 , Rebecca Wells  4 , Alicia Bunger  5
Affiliations

An empirical typology of private child and family serving agencies

Emmeline Chuang et al. Child Youth Serv Rev. .

Abstract

Differences in how services are organized and delivered can contribute significantly to variation in outcomes experienced by children and families. However, few comparative studies identify the strengths and limitations of alternative delivery system configurations. The current study provides the first empirical typology of private agencies involved with the formal child welfare system. Data collected in 2011 from a national sample of private agencies were used to classify agencies into five distinct groups based on internal management capacity, service diversification, integration, and policy advocacy. Findings reveal considerable heterogeneity in the population of private child and family serving agencies. Cross-group comparisons suggest that differences in agencies' strategic and structural characteristics correlated with agency directors' perceptions of different pressures in their external environment. Future research can use this typology to better understand local service systems and the extent to which different agency strategies affect performance and other outcomes. Such information has implications for public agency contracting decisions and could inform system-level assessment and planning of services for children and families.

Keywords: child welfare; management; private agencies; strategy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Dendogram of agency groupings
See this image and copyright information in PMC

Similar articles

See all similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Aarons GA, Palinkas L. Implementation of evidence-based practice in child welfare: Service provider perspectives. Administration and Policy in Mental Health and Mental Health Services Research. 2007;34(4):411–419. - PubMed
    1. Aldrich H, Ruef M. Organizations evolving, 2nd edition. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2006.
    1. Alexander J. Adaptive strategies of nonprofit human service organizations in an era of devolution and New Public Management. Nonprofit Management & Leadership. 2000;10(3):287–303.
    1. Alexander J, Vaughn T, Burns L, Zuckerman H, Andersen RM, Torrens P, Hilberman D. Organizational approaches to integrated health care delivery: A taxonomic analysis of physician-organization arrangements. Medical Care Research and Review. 1996;53(1):71–93. - PubMed
    1. Alter C. Interorganizational collaboration in the task environment. In: Patti RJ, editor. The handbook of social welfare management. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage; 2000.