Porcine dermis implants in soft-tissue reconstruction: current status
- PMID: 24648721
- PMCID: PMC3956623
- DOI: 10.2147/BTT.S46469
Porcine dermis implants in soft-tissue reconstruction: current status
Abstract
Soft-tissue reconstruction for a variety of surgical conditions, such as abdominal wall hernia or pelvic organ prolapse, remains a challenge. There are numerous meshes available that may be simply categorized as either synthetic or biologic. Within biologic meshes, porcine dermal meshes have come to dominate the market. This review examines the current evidence for their use and the limitations of knowledge. Although there is increasing evidence to support their safety, long-term follow-up studies that support their efficacy are lacking. Numerous clinical trials that remain ongoing may help elucidate their precise role in soft-tissue reconstruction.
Keywords: biologic; hernia; mesh; xenograft.
Figures



References
-
- Read RC. Milestones in the history of hernia surgery: prosthetic repair. Hernia. 2004;8(1):8–14. - PubMed
-
- van’t Riet M, de Vos van Steenwijk PJ, Bonjer HJ, Steyerberg EW, Jeekel J. Mesh repair for postoperative wound dehiscence in the presence of infection: is absorbable mesh safer than non-absorbable mesh? Hernia. 2007;11(5):409–413. - PubMed
-
- Choi JJ, Palaniappa NC, Dallas KB, Rudich TB, Colon MJ, Divino CM. Use of mesh during ventral hernia repair in clean-contaminated and contaminated cases: outcomes of 33,832 cases. Ann Surg. 2012;255(1):176–180. - PubMed
-
- Sims TJ, Avery NC, Bailey AJ. Quantitative determination of collagen crosslinks. Methods Mol Biol. 2000;139:11–26. - PubMed
Publication types
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources