Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan;2(1):31-37.
doi: 10.3892/mco.2013.201. Epub 2013 Oct 17.

Middle and lower esophagectomy preceded by hand-assisted laparoscopic transhiatal approach for distal esophageal cancer

Affiliations

Middle and lower esophagectomy preceded by hand-assisted laparoscopic transhiatal approach for distal esophageal cancer

Atsushi Shiozaki et al. Mol Clin Oncol. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

Respiratory morbidity is the most frequent complication following an esophagectomy. This study was designed to determine the efficacy of middle and lower esophagectomies preceded by the hand-assisted laparoscopic transhiatal approach (LTHA) regarding the perioperative outcomes of distal esophageal cancer. The esophageal hiatus was opened and carbon dioxide was introduced into the mediastinum. Dissection of the distal esophagus was performed up to the level of the tracheal bifurcation. En bloc dissection of the posterior mediastinal lymph nodes was performed using the LTHA. Subsequently, a small thoracotomy (10 cm) was performed to divide the thoracic esophagus and allow middle mediastinal lymphadenectomy. Finally, reconstruction via the posterior mediastinal route with a gastric tube and anastomosis in the thoracic cavity were performed using a circular stapler. The treatment outcomes of 10 patients who underwent LTHA-preceded middle and lower esophagectomy were compared to those of 11 patients treated without prior LTHA (thoracotomy, 20 cm). The total operative time, the duration of one-lung ventilation and total operative blood loss were significantly decreased in the LTHA group. The number of resected lymph nodes did not differ significantly between the two groups. Postoperative respiratory complications occurred in 10.0% of patients treated with, and 36.3% of those treated without LTHA. The extubation time following surgery, the duration of thoracic drainage and postoperative hospital stay were significantly decreased by this method. In conclusion, middle and lower esophagectomies preceded by LTHA provides a good surgical view of the posterior mediastinum, markedly shortens the duration of one-lung ventilation and improves the perioperative outcome.

Keywords: distal esophageal cancer; laparoscopic transhiatal approach.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1.
Figure 1.
(A) Intraoperative view of the trocars and incision locations on the abdomen. A lap disc (regular) was placed in the upper abdomen. Three 12-mm ports were inserted, one in each flank and one in the left hypochondrium; one 5-mm port for the videoscope was inserted in the lower abdomen. (B) The esophageal hiatus was divided and carbon dioxide was introduced into the mediastinum. Dissection of the anterior sides of the posterior mediastinal lymph nodes was performed with the EnSeal device. (C) The anterior and posterior sides of the posterior mediastinal lymph nodes were resected: while lifting up these lymph nodes like a membrane, they were cut along the borderline of the left mediastinal pleura. (D) The posterior mediastinal lymph nodes (thoracic paraaortic and left pulmonary ligament lymph nodes) were dissected en bloc.
Figure 2.
Figure 2.
(A) The dissection of the posterior mediastinal lymph nodes was extended towards the caudal side from the crura of the diaphragm to the celiac artery. (B) The left gastric artery was exposed from the left side and the lymph nodes along the left gastric artery were dissected. (C) An incision was made in the right mediastinal pleura and was extended to the level of the arch of the azygos vein. (D) Reconstruction via the posterior mediastinal route with a gastric tube and anastomosis in the thoracic cavity were performed using a circular stapler (CDH25) via the thoracic approach.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Tachibana M, Kinugasa S, Yoshimura H, et al. Clinical outcomes of extended esophagectomy with three-field lymph node dissection for esophageal squamous cell carcinoma. Am J Surg. 2005;189:98–109. - PubMed
    1. Whooley BP, Law S, Murthy SC, Alexandrou A, Wong J. Analysis of reduced death and complication rates after esophageal resection. Ann Surg. 2001;233:338–344. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Law S, Wong KH, Kwok KF, Chu KM, Wong J. Predictive factors for postoperative pulmonary complications and mortality after esophagectomy for cancer. Ann Surg. 2004;240:791–800. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Ferguson MK, Durkin AE. Preoperative prediction of the risk of pulmonary complications after esophagectomy for cancer. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2002;123:661–669. - PubMed
    1. Bailey SH, Bull DA, Harpole DH, et al. Outcomes after esophagectomy: a ten-year prospective cohort. Ann Thorac Surg. 2003;75:217–222. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources