Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Jun;46(2):91-100.
doi: 10.1363/46e0914. Epub 2014 Mar 20.

Prime Time: long-term sexual health outcomes of a clinic-linked intervention

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Prime Time: long-term sexual health outcomes of a clinic-linked intervention

Renee E Sieving et al. Perspect Sex Reprod Health. 2014 Jun.

Abstract

Context: Evidence about long-term effects of preventive health services for youth with complex needs is lacking. Prime Time, a youth development intervention, aims to reduce pregnancy risk among vulnerable adolescent females seeking clinic services.

Methods: In a randomized trial, 253 sexually active females aged 13-17 who were at high risk for pregnancy were assigned to the Prime Time intervention or usual clinic services. The 18-month intervention, initiated in 2007-2008, comprised regular meetings with case managers and participation in youth leadership groups. Trial participants completed surveys at baseline and 30 months. Regression analyses were used to evaluate differences between groups in sexual and psychosocial outcomes at follow-up.

Results: At 30 months, the intervention group reported more months of consistent condom use (adjusted means, 1.8 vs. 1.1) and dual contraceptive use (0.9 vs. 0.3) in the past seven months than did controls. The intervention was most effective in promoting consistent use among participants with relatively high levels of connectedness to family or school. Fifteen percent of intervention participants, but only 6% of controls, reported having abstained from sex in the past six months (adjusted odds ratio, 2.9). Moreover, among high school graduates, those in the intervention group were more likely than those in the control group to have enrolled in college or technical school (72% vs. 37%; odds ratio, 4.5).

Conclusion: Health services grounded in a youth development framework can lead to reductions in sexual risk among vulnerable youth that are evident one year following conclusion of services.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Hamilton BE, Mathews TJ, Ventura SJ. NCHS Data Brief. 123. Hyattsville, MD: National Center for Health Statistics; 2013. Declines in state teen birth rates by race and Hispanic origin. - PubMed
    1. National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy. Fast Facts: Teen Pregnancy in the United States. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy; 2013.
    1. Maynard R, Hoffman S. The costs of adolescent childbearing. In: Maynard R, Hoffman S, editors. Kids Having Kids: Economic Costs and Social Consequences of Teen Pregnancy. Washington, DC: Urban Institute Press; 2008.
    1. Kearney MS, Levine PB. Why is the teen birth rate in the United States so high and why does it matter? Journal of Economic Perspectives. 2012;26(2):141–166. - PubMed
    1. Hoffman S. Counting It Up: The Public Costs of Teen Childbearing. Washington, DC: National Campaign to Prevent Teen and Unplanned Pregnancy; 2011.

Publication types