Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Aug;80(2):246-52.
doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.01.033. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

Externally removable stents in the treatment of benign recalcitrant strictures and esophageal perforations in pediatric patients with esophageal atresia

Affiliations

Externally removable stents in the treatment of benign recalcitrant strictures and esophageal perforations in pediatric patients with esophageal atresia

Michael A Manfredi et al. Gastrointest Endosc. 2014 Aug.

Abstract

Background: We investigated whether removable stents, such as self-expandable plastic stents (SEPSs) and fully covered self-expandable metal stents (FCSEMSs) could provide an alternative treatment for recalcitrant strictures and esophageal perforations after esophageal atresia (EA) repair.

Objective: The primary aim of our study was to evaluate technical feasibility. Secondary aims were to evaluate safety and procedural success.

Design: Retrospective study.

Setting: Tertiary-care referral center.

Patients: A total of 24 children with EA.

Interventions: Retrospective review of all children with EA who underwent dilation and esophageal stent placement from January 2010 to February 2013 at our institution.

Main outcome measurements: Healing of perforation and stricture resolution at 30 and 90 days.

Results: A total of 41 stents (SEPSs 14, FCSEMSs 27) were placed in 24 patients with EA during the study period, including 14 who had developed esophageal leaks. Procedural success of esophageal stent placement in the treatment of refractory strictures was 39% at 30 days and 26% at 90 days. The success rate was 80% for closure of esophageal perforations with stent therapy after dilation and 25% for perforations associated with surgical repair. Adverse events of stent placement included migration (21% of SEPSs and 7% of FCSEMSs), granulation tissue (37% of FCSEMSs), and deep ulcerations (22% of FCSEMSs).

Limitations: Retrospective study with small sample size.

Conclusion: SEPSs and FCSEMSs can be placed successfully in small infants and children with a history of EA repair. The stents appear to be safe and beneficial in closing esophageal perforations, especially post-dilation. However, a high stricture recurrence rate after stent removal may limit their usefulness in treating recalcitrant esophageal anastomotic strictures.

PubMed Disclaimer

MeSH terms

LinkOut - more resources