Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 20:4:4405.
doi: 10.1038/srep04405.

Effects of halving pesticide use on wheat production

Affiliations

Effects of halving pesticide use on wheat production

L Hossard et al. Sci Rep. .

Abstract

Pesticides pose serious threats to both human health and the environment. In Europe, farmers are encouraged to reduce their use, and in France a recent environmental policy fixed a target of halving the pesticide use by 2018. Organic and integrated cropping systems have been proposed as possible solutions for reducing pesticide use, but the effect of reducing pesticide use on crop yield remains unclear. Here we use a set of cropping system experiments to quantify the yield losses resulting from a reduction of pesticide use for winter wheat in France. Our estimated yield losses resulting from a 50% reduction in pesticide use ranged from 5 to 13% of the yield obtained with the current pesticide use. At the scale of the whole country, these losses would decrease the French wheat production by about 2 to 3 millions of tons, which represent about 15% of the French wheat export.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1. Nine yield response curves fitted by quantile regression, for quantile values ranging from 0.1 (lowest curve) to 0.9 (highest curve) with a step of 0.1.
Two different functions were considered; log (A) and quadratic (B). Black points indicate the yield data.
Figure 2
Figure 2. Fitted yield response curves obtained with the stochastic frontier analysis method using the log function (A) and the quadratic function (B).
Dotted lines indicate the 95% confidence intervals of the fitted curves.
Figure 3
Figure 3. Yield losses resulting from a 50% reduction of pesticide use (in red) and from a 100% reduction (zero pesticide, in blue).
Losses were estimated using quantile regression for quantile values ranging from 0.1 to 0.9. Dotted lines indicate 95% confidence intervals.

References

    1. Food and Agriculture Organization of the United Nations (FAOSTAT). FAO Statistical Databases, http://faostat.fao.org/site/567/default.aspx (accessed, October 2013).
    1. Foley J. A. et al. Solutions for a cultivated planet. Nature. 478, 337–342 (2011). - PubMed
    1. Enserink M., Hines P. J., Vignieri S. N., Wigginton N. S. & Yeston J. S. The pesticide paradox. Science. 341, 729 (2013). - PubMed
    1. Elbaz A. et al. Professional exposure to pesticides and Parkinson disease. Ann Neurol. 66, 494–504 (2009). - PubMed
    1. National Institute of Health and Medical Research in France (Inserm). Pesticides, effets sur la santé. Expertise collective, Synthèse et recommendations. http://www.inserm.fr/actualites/rubriques/actualites-societe/pesticides-... (accessed, June 2013).