Immersion in water during labor and delivery
- PMID: 24652300
- DOI: 10.1542/peds.2013-3794
Immersion in water during labor and delivery
Abstract
Immersion in water has been suggested as a beneficial alternative for labor, delivery, or both and over the past decades has gained popularity in many parts of the world. Immersion in water during the first stage of labor may be associated with decreased pain or use of anesthesia and decreased duration of labor. However, there is no evidence that immersion in water during the first stage of labor otherwise improves perinatal outcomes, and it should not prevent or inhibit other elements of care. The safety and efficacy of immersion in water during the second stage of labor have not been established, and immersion in water during the second stage of labor has not been associated with maternal or fetal benefit. Given these facts and case reports of rare but serious adverse effects in the newborn, the practice of immersion in the second stage of labor (underwater delivery) should be considered an experimental procedure that only should be performed within the context of an appropriately designed clinical trial with informed consent. Facilities that plan to offer immersion in the first stage of labor need to establish rigorous protocols for candidate selection, maintenance and cleaning of tubs and immersion pools, infection control procedures, monitoring of mothers and fetuses at appropriate intervals while immersed, and immediately and safely moving women out of the tubs if maternal or fetal concerns develop.
Keywords: delivery; immersion; labor; perinatal care; water birth.
Similar articles
-
ACOG Committee Opinion no. 594: Immersion in water during labor and delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2014 Apr;123(4):912-5. doi: 10.1097/01.AOG.0000445585.52522.14. Obstet Gynecol. 2014. PMID: 24785637
-
Committee Opinion No. 679: Immersion in Water During Labor and Delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;128(5):e231-e236. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001771. Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27776074
-
Committee Opinion No. 679 Summary: Immersion in Water During Labor and Delivery.Obstet Gynecol. 2016 Nov;128(5):1198-1199. doi: 10.1097/AOG.0000000000001765. Obstet Gynecol. 2016. PMID: 27776069
-
[Underwater delivery. Consensus of the Spanish Neonatology Society and the Perinatal Section of the Spanish Obstetrics and Gynecology Society].An Pediatr (Barc). 2015 Feb;82(2):108.e1-3. doi: 10.1016/j.anpedi.2014.06.013. Epub 2014 Jul 26. An Pediatr (Barc). 2015. PMID: 25074709 Spanish.
-
How valid are the common concerns raised against water birth? A focused review of the literature.Women Birth. 2013 Jun;26(2):105-9. doi: 10.1016/j.wombi.2012.10.006. Epub 2012 Nov 21. Women Birth. 2013. PMID: 23182130 Review.
Cited by
-
Is a randomized controlled trial of waterbirth possible? An Australian feasibility study.Birth. 2022 Dec;49(4):697-708. doi: 10.1111/birt.12635. Epub 2022 Apr 4. Birth. 2022. PMID: 35373861 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Hydrotherapy in Pain Management in Pregnant Women: A Meta-Analysis of Randomized Clinical Trials.J Clin Med. 2024 May 31;13(11):3260. doi: 10.3390/jcm13113260. J Clin Med. 2024. PMID: 38892969 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Maternal and neonatal outcomes following waterbirth: a cohort study of 17 530 waterbirths and 17 530 propensity score-matched land births.BJOG. 2022 May;129(6):950-958. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.17009. Epub 2021 Dec 1. BJOG. 2022. PMID: 34773367 Free PMC article.
-
Case Report of Haemophilus parainfluenzae Sepsis in a Newborn Infant Following Water Birth and a Review of Literature.AJP Rep. 2015 Oct;5(2):e188-92. doi: 10.1055/s-0035-1556068. Epub 2015 Jul 14. AJP Rep. 2015. PMID: 26495182 Free PMC article.
-
Systematic Reviews and Synthesis without Meta-Analysis on Hydrotherapy for Pain Control in Labor.Healthcare (Basel). 2024 Feb 1;12(3):373. doi: 10.3390/healthcare12030373. Healthcare (Basel). 2024. PMID: 38338258 Free PMC article. Review.
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Miscellaneous