Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 Mar 15;7(1):60-6.
Epub 2014 Mar 25.

Postoperative surgical complications of lymphadenohysterocolpectomy

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Postoperative surgical complications of lymphadenohysterocolpectomy

F Marin et al. J Med Life. .

Abstract

Rationale The current standard surgical treatment for the cervix and uterine cancer is the radical hysterectomy (lymphadenohysterocolpectomy). This has the risk of intraoperative accidents and postoperative associated morbidity. Objective The purpose of this article is the evaluation and quantification of the associated complications in comparison to the postoperative morbidity which resulted after different types of radical hysterectomy. METHODS AND RESULTS PATIENTS WERE DIVIDED ACCORDING TO THE TYPE OF SURGERY PERFORMED AS FOLLOWS: for cervical cancer - group A- 37 classic radical hysterectomies Class III Piver - Rutledge -Smith ( PRS ), group B -208 modified radical hysterectomies Class II PRS and for uterine cancer- group C -79 extended hysterectomies with pelvic lymphadenectomy from which 17 patients with paraaortic lymphnode biopsy . All patients performed preoperative radiotherapy and 88 of them associated radiosensitization. Discussion Early complications were intra-abdominal bleeding ( 2.7% Class III PRS vs 0.48% Class II PRS), supra-aponeurotic hematoma ( 5.4% III vs 2.4% II) , dynamic ileus (2.7% III vs 0.96% II) and uro - genital fistulas (5.4% III vs 0.96% II).The late complications were the bladder dysfunction (21.6% III vs 16.35% II) , lower limb lymphedema (13.5% III vs 11.5% II), urethral strictures (10.8% III vs 4.8% II) , incisional hernias ( 8.1% III vs 7.2% II), persistent pelvic pain (18.91% III vs 7.7% II), bowel obstruction (5.4% III vs 1.4% II) and deterioration of sexual function (83.3% III vs 53.8% II). PRS class II radical hysterectomy is associated with fewer complications than PRS class III radical hysterectomy , except for the complications of lymphadenectomy . A new method that might reduce these complications is a selective lymphadenectomy represented by sentinel node biopsy . In conclusion PRS class II radical hysterectomy associated with neoadjuvant radiotherapy is a therapeutic option for the incipient stages of cervical cancer.

Abbreviations: PRS- Piver Rutledge-Smith, II- class II, III- class III.

Keywords: cervical cancer; lymphadenohysterocolpectomy; postoperative complications; radical hysterectomy; uterine cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ferlay J, Shin HR. D.M. GLOBOCAN 2008 v1.2, Cancer Incidence and Mortality Worldwide. IARC CancerBase No.10 [Internet]. . Lyon, France: International Agency for Research on Cancer. 2010
    1. Verleye L, Vergote N. Quality assurance for radical hysterectomy for cervical cancer: the view of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer—Gynecological Cancer Group (EORTC-GCG) - PubMed
    1. Piver MS, Rutledge F. Five classes of extended hysterectomy for women with cervical cancer. Obstet Gynecol . 1974;44:265–272. - PubMed
    1. Suciu N, Toader O, compilers. In: Cancerul de Endometru. Tratat de chirurgie. Editura Academiei Romane; 2008.
    1. Mota F, Vergote I. Classification of radical hysterectomy adopted by the Gynecological Cancer Group of the European Organization for Research and Treatment of Cancer. Int J Gynecol Cancer . 2008;18:1136–1138. - PubMed

Publication types