Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Randomized Controlled Trial
. 2014 Apr:55:48-53.
doi: 10.1016/j.brat.2014.02.003. Epub 2014 Feb 26.

Cognitive-behavioral group depression prevention compared to bibliotherapy and brochure control: nonsignificant effects in pilot effectiveness trial with college students

Affiliations
Randomized Controlled Trial

Cognitive-behavioral group depression prevention compared to bibliotherapy and brochure control: nonsignificant effects in pilot effectiveness trial with college students

Paul Rohde et al. Behav Res Ther. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

Objective: Conduct a pilot trial testing whether a brief cognitive-behavioral (CB) group reduced depressive symptoms and secondary outcomes relative to bibliotherapy and brochure controls in college students with elevated depressive symptoms.

Method: 82 college students (M age=19.0, SD=0.9; 70% female, 80% White) with elevated self-assessed depressive symptoms were randomized to a 6-session CB group, bibliotherapy, or educational brochure control condition, completing assessments at pretest, posttest, and at 6- and 12-month follow-up.

Results: Planned contrasts found no significant effects for CB group on depressive symptoms compared to either bibliotherapy or brochure controls at posttest (d=-.08 and .06, respectively) or over follow-up (d=-.04 and -.10, respectively). There were no intervention effects for social adjustment and substance use, though CB group participants had improved knowledge of CB concepts at posttest, versus brochure controls. Condition differences in major depression onset were nonsignificant but suggested support for CB interventions (CB group=7.4%, bibliotherapy=4.5%, brochure control=15.2%).

Conclusions: Unexpectedly modest support was found for a brief CB group depression prevention intervention, compared to bibliotherapy or brochure control, when provided to self-selected college students, suggesting that alternative screening or interventions approaches are needed for this population.

Keywords: Bibliotherapy; Cognitive-behavioral; College students; Depression; Prevention.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Participant Flow Chart.

References

    1. American College Health Association-National College Health Assessment [ACHA-NCHA] American College Health Association—National College Health Assessment Spring 2008 Reference Group Data Report (Abridged) Journal of American College Health. 2009;57:477–488. - PubMed
    1. Bauer DJ, Sterba SK, Hallfors DD. Evaluating group-based interventions when control participants are ungrouped. Multivariate Behavioral Research. 2008;43:210–236. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Buchanan JL. Prevention of depression in college study population: A review of the literature. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing. 2012;26:21–42. - PubMed
    1. Burns DD. Feeling Good: The New Mood Therapy. New York: William Morrow & Company; 1980.
    1. Cummings JR, Druss BG. Racial/ethnic differences in mental health service use among adolescents with major depression. Journal of the American Academy of Child and Adolescent Psychiatry. 2011;50:160–170. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types