Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Apr;20(4):643-8.
doi: 10.3201/eid2004.131681.

Epidemic of mumps among vaccinated persons, The Netherlands, 2009-2012

Epidemic of mumps among vaccinated persons, The Netherlands, 2009-2012

Jussi Sane et al. Emerg Infect Dis. 2014 Apr.

Abstract

To analyze the epidemiology of a nationwide mumps epidemic in the Netherlands, we reviewed 1,557 notified mumps cases in persons who had disease onset during September 1, 2009-August 31, 2012. Seasonality peaked in spring and autumn. Most case-patients were males (59%), 18-25 years of age (67.9%), and vaccinated twice with measles-mumps-rubella vaccine (67.7%). Nearly half (46.6%) of cases occurred in university students or in persons with student contacts. Receipt of 2 doses of vaccine reduced the risk for orchitis, the most frequently reported complication (vaccine effectiveness [VE] 74%, 95% CI 57%-85%); complications overall (VE 76%, 95% CI 61%-86%); and hospitalization (VE 82%, 95% CI 53%-93%). Over time, the age distribution of case-patients changed, and proportionally more cases were reported from nonuniversity cities (p<0.001). Changes in age and geographic distribution over time may reflect increased immunity among students resulting from intense exposure to circulating mumps virus.

Keywords: MMR; epidemic; herd immunity; immunization; mumps; outbreaks; surveillance; the Netherlands; vaccination; vaccine; viruses.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure
Numbers of notified mumps cases, by week of onset, The Netherlands, September 1, 2009–August 31, 2012 (N = 1,557 cases). Seasons and number of cases (n) are indicated; black line indicates 3-week moving average.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hviid A, Rubin S, Muhlemann K. Mumps. Lancet. 2008;371:932–44. 10.1016/S0140-6736(08)60419-5 - DOI - PubMed
    1. McLean HQ, Hickman CJ, Seward JF; World Health Organization Department of Immunization, Vaccines and Biologicals. The immunological basis for immunization series. Module 16: mumps. Geneva: The Organization; 2010. [cited 2014 Jan 10]. http://whqlibdoc.who.int/publications/2010/9789241500661_eng.pdf
    1. van Lier EA, Oomen PJ, Oostenbrug MW, Zwakhals SL, Drijfhout IH, de Hoogh PA, et al. High vaccination coverage of the National Immunization Programme in the Netherlands [in Dutch]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd. 2009;153:950–7 . - PubMed
    1. Brockhoff HJ, Mollema L, Sonder GJ, Postema CA, van Binnendijk RS, Kohl RH, et al. Mumps outbreak in a highly vaccinated student population, the Netherlands, 2004. Vaccine. 2010;28:2932–6. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2010.02.020 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Snijders BE, van Lier A, van de Kassteele J, Fanoy EB, Ruijs WL, Hulshof F, et al. Mumps vaccine effectiveness in primary schools and households, the Netherlands, 2008. Vaccine. 2012;30:2999–3002. 10.1016/j.vaccine.2012.02.035 - DOI - PubMed

Publication types

Substances

LinkOut - more resources