Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jun 28;348(1-2):1-11.
doi: 10.1016/j.canlet.2014.03.010. Epub 2014 Mar 18.

Prostaglandin E3 metabolism and cancer

Affiliations
Review

Prostaglandin E3 metabolism and cancer

Peiying Yang et al. Cancer Lett. .

Abstract

The anticancer activity of n-3 fatty acids, especially those derived from fish, such as eicosapentaenoic acid (EPA) and docosahexaenoic acid) (DHA), has been studied for centuries. While there is a growing body of evidence that EPA and DHA may influence cancer initiation and development through targeting multiple events of tumor development, the underlying mechanisms responsible for these activities are still not fully understood. A number of studies have suggested that the anticancer activities of EPA and DHA are associated with their effects on eicosanoid metabolism by which they inhibit prostaglandin E2 (PGE2) production. In contrast to DHA, EPA can function as a substrate for cyclooxygenases (COXs) to synthesize unique 3-series prostaglandin compounds, especially PGE3. With advance technology in mass spectrometry, there is renewed interest in studying the role of PGE3 in EPA elicited anti-proliferative activity in various cancers, with some promising results. Here, we summarize the regulation of PGE3 synthesis in cancer cells and its role in EPA elicited anticancer activity. The development of PGE3 and its metabolites as potential biomarkers for future clinical evaluation of EPA and fish oil in cancer care is discussed.

Keywords: Cancer cells; Metabolism; PGE(3); Tumor tissues; n-3 Fatty acids.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflict of Interest: Authors have no conflict of interest to declare that is relevant to this review.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Comparison of EPA and AA cyclooxygenase metabolism. Modified from Pirman et al. [68], Wada et al. [22].
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Proposed schematic signaling pathways for PGE3 induced EP receptor activation [80,121].

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Rothwell PM, Wilson M, Elwin CE, Norrving B, Algra A, Warlow CP, Meade TW. Long-term effect of aspirin on colorectal cancer incidence and mortality: 20-year follow-up of five randomised trials. Lancet. 2010;376:1741–1750. - PubMed
    1. Chan AT, Ogino S, Fuchs CS. Aspirin and the risk of colorectal cancer in relation to the expression of COX-2. New Engl J Med. 2007;356:2131–2142. - PubMed
    1. Chan AT, Ogino S, Fuchs CS. Aspirin use and survival after diagnosis of colorectal cancer. JAMA. 2009;302:649–658. - PMC - PubMed
    1. McCarty MF. Minimizing the cancer-promotional activity of cox-2 as a central strategy in cancer prevention. Med Hypotheses. 2012;78:45–57. - PubMed
    1. Wang D, Dubois RN. The role of COX-2 in intestinal inflammation and colorectal cancer. Oncogene. 2010;29:781–788. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms