Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013;45(3):393-414.
doi: 10.18666/jlr-2013-v45-i3-3157.

Does Leisure Time as a Stress Coping Resource Increase Affective Complexity? Applying the Dynamic Model of Affect (DMA)

Affiliations

Does Leisure Time as a Stress Coping Resource Increase Affective Complexity? Applying the Dynamic Model of Affect (DMA)

Xinyi Lisa Qian et al. J Leis Res. 2013.

Abstract

Affective complexity, a manifestation of psychological well-being, refers to the relative independence between positive and negative affect (PA, NA). According to the Dynamic Model of Affect (DMA), stressful situations lead to highly inverse PA-NA relationship, reducing affective complexity. Meanwhile, positive events can sustain affective complexity by restoring PA-NA independence. Leisure, a type of positive events, has been identified as a coping resource. This study used the DMA to assess whether leisure time helps restore affective complexity on stressful days. We found that on days with more leisure time than usual, an individual experienced less negative PA-NA relationship after daily stressful events. The finding demonstrates the value of leisure time as a coping resource and the DMA's contribution to coping research.

Keywords: The Dynamic Model of Affect (DMA); coping; daily stress; leisure time; within-person change.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

FIGURE 1
FIGURE 1
THE WITHIN-PERSON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECT WAS MORE NEGATIVE ON DAYS WITH HIGH (+1SD) DAILY STRESS FREQUENCY (SOLID LINE) THAN ON DAYS WITH LOW (−1SD) DAILY STRESS FREQUENCY (DOTTED LINE)
FIGURE 2
FIGURE 2
THE WITHIN-PERSON RELATIONSHIP BETWEEN POSITIVE AND NEGATIVE AFFECT WAS LESS NEGATIVE ON DAYS WITH HIGH (+1SD) LEISURE TIME AVAILABILITY (SOLID LINE) THAN ON DAYS WITH LOW (−1SD) LEISURE TIME AVAILABILITY (DOTTED LINE)

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Almeida A. Resilience and vulnerability to daily stressors assessed via diary methods. Current Directions in Psychological Science. 2005;14:64–68.
    1. Almeida D, Kessler R. Everyday stressors and gender differences in daily distress. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 1998;75:670–680. - PubMed
    1. Almeida A, Wong J. Life transitions and daily stress processes. In: Elder G Jr, Giele J, editors. The craft of life course research. New York, NY: Guilford; 2009. pp. 141–162.
    1. Almeida DM, McGonagle K, King H. Assessing daily stress processes in social surveys by combining stressor exposure and salivary cortisol. Biodemography and Social Biology. 2009;55:219–237. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Almeida D, Wethington E, Kessler R. The daily inventory of stressful events: An interview-based approach for measuring daily stressors. Assessment. 2002;9:41–55. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources