Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Mar 21;20(11):2854-66.
doi: 10.3748/wjg.v20.i11.2854.

Non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C

Affiliations
Review

Non-invasive diagnosis of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C

Leonardo de Lucca Schiavon et al. World J Gastroenterol. .

Abstract

Assessment of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C virus (HCV) infection is considered a relevant part of patient care and key for decision making. Although liver biopsy has been considered the gold standard for staging liver fibrosis, it is an invasive technique and subject to sampling errors and significant intra- and inter-observer variability. Over the last decade, several noninvasive markers were proposed for liver fibrosis diagnosis in chronic HCV infection, with variable performance. Besides the clear advantage of being noninvasive, a more objective interpretation of test results may overcome the mentioned intra- and inter-observer variability of liver biopsy. In addition, these tests can theoretically offer a more accurate view of fibrogenic events occurring in the entire liver with the advantage of providing frequent fibrosis evaluation without additional risk. However, in general, these tests show low accuracy in discriminating between intermediate stages of fibrosis and may be influenced by several hepatic and extra-hepatic conditions. These methods are either serum markers (usually combined in a mathematical model) or imaging modalities that can be used separately or combined in algorithms to improve accuracy. In this review we will discuss the different noninvasive methods that are currently available for the evaluation of liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C, their advantages, limitations and application in clinical practice.

Keywords: Diagnosis; Elasticity imaging techniques; Hepatitis C; Liver cirrhosis; Liver fibrosis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Suggested algorithm for diagnosing liver fibrosis in chronic hepatitis C. Patients with concordant results in two techniques (serum and imaging) may be followed without liver biopsy and histological analysis can be reserved for those with discordant results. HCV: Hepatitis C virus.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Everhart JE, Wright EC, Goodman ZD, Dienstag JL, Hoefs JC, Kleiner DE, Ghany MG, Mills AS, Nash SR, Govindarajan S, et al. Prognostic value of Ishak fibrosis stage: findings from the hepatitis C antiviral long-term treatment against cirrhosis trial. Hepatology. 2010;51:585–594. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Lawson A, Hagan S, Rye K, Taguri N, Ratib S, Zaitoun AM, Neal KR, Ryder SD, Irving WL. The natural history of hepatitis C with severe hepatic fibrosis. J Hepatol. 2007;47:37–45. - PubMed
    1. Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, Seeff LB. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: an update. Hepatology. 2009;49:1335–1374. - PMC - PubMed
    1. European Association for the Study of the Liver. EASL Clinical Practice Guidelines: management of hepatitis C virus infection. J Hepatol. 2011;55:245–264. - PubMed
    1. Scheuer PJ. Classification of chronic viral hepatitis: a need for reassessment. J Hepatol. 1991;13:372–374. - PubMed