Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Mar 13:8:141.
doi: 10.3389/fnhum.2014.00141. eCollection 2014.

Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury

Affiliations
Review

Who is going to walk? A review of the factors influencing walking recovery after spinal cord injury

Giorgio Scivoletto et al. Front Hum Neurosci. .

Abstract

The recovery of walking function is considered of extreme relevance both by patients and physicians. Consequently, in the recent years, recovery of locomotion become a major objective of new pharmacological and rehabilitative interventions. In the last decade, several pharmacological treatment and rehabilitative approaches have been initiated to enhance locomotion capacity of SCI patients. Basic science advances in regeneration of the central nervous system hold promise of further neurological and functional recovery to be studied in clinical trials. Therefore, a precise knowledge of the natural course of walking recovery after SCI and of the factors affecting the prognosis for recovery has become mandatory. In the present work we reviewed the prognostic factors for walking recovery, with particular attention paid to the clinical ones (neurological examination at admission, age, etiology gender, time course of recovery). The prognostic value of some instrumental examinations has also been reviewed. Based on these factors we suggest that a reliable prognosis for walking recovery is possible. Instrumental examinations, in particular evoked potentials could be useful to improve the prognosis.

Keywords: prognostic factors; spinal cord injury; walking recovery.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Scoring sheet for the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association: International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, revised 2013; Atlanta, GA. Reprinted 2013.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Scoring sheet for the International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury. American Spinal Injury Association: International Standards for Neurological Classification of Spinal Cord Injury, revised 2013; Atlanta, GA. Reprinted 2013.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. (2002). Management of acute central cervical spinal cord injuries. Neurosurgery 50(3 Suppl), S166–S172 - PubMed
    1. Aalfs C. M., Koelman J. H., Meyjes F. E., de Visser B. W. O. (1993). Posterior tibial and sural nerve somatosensory evoked potentials: a study in spastic paraparesis in spinal cord lesions. Electroencephalogr. Clin. Neurophysiol. 89, 437–441 10.1016/0168-5597(93)90118-9 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Aito S., D'Andrea M., Werhagen L., Farsetti L., Cappelli S., Bandini B., et al. (2006). Neurological and functional outcome in traumatic central cord syndrome. Spinal Cord 45, 292–297 10.1038/sj.sc.3101944 - DOI - PubMed
    1. American Spinal Injury Association. (2000). International standards for neurological classifications of spinal cord Injury (revised). Chicago, IL: American Spinal Injury Association
    1. Andreoli C., Colaiacomo M. C., Rojas Beccaglia M., Di Biasi C., Casciani E., Gualdi G. (2005). MRI in the acute phase of spinal cord traumatic lesions: Relationship between MRI findings and neurological outcome. Radiol. Med. 110, 636–645 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources