Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 24:7:170.
doi: 10.1186/1756-0500-7-170.

Veterinary students' perceptions of their learning environment as measured by the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure

Affiliations

Veterinary students' perceptions of their learning environment as measured by the Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure

Jacquelyn M Pelzer et al. BMC Res Notes. .

Abstract

Background: The Dundee Ready Education Environment Measure (DREEM) has been widely used to evaluate the learning environment within health sciences education, however, this tool has not been applied in veterinary medical education. The aim of this study was to evaluate the reliability and validity of the DREEM tool in a veterinary medical program and to determine veterinary students' perceptions of their learning environment.

Methods: The DREEM is a survey tool which quantitatively measures students' perceptions of their learning environment. The survey consists of 50 items, each scored 0-4 on a Likert Scale. The 50 items are subsequently analysed within five subscales related to students' perceptions of learning, faculty (teachers), academic atmosphere, and self-perceptions (academic and social). An overall score is obtained by summing the mean score for each subscale, with an overall possible score of 200. All students in the program were asked to complete the DREEM. Means and standard deviations were calculated for the 50 items, the five subscale scores and the overall score. Cronbach's alpha was determined for the five subscales and overall score to evaluate reliability. Confirmatory factor analysis was used to evaluate construct validity.

Results: 224 responses (53%) were received. The Cronbach's alpha for the overall score was 0.93 and for the five subscales were; perceptions of learning 0.85, perceptions of faculty 0.79, perceptions of atmosphere 0.81, academic self-perceptions 0.68, and social self-perceptions 0.72. Construct validity was determined to be acceptable (p < 0.001) and all items contributed to the overall validity of the DREEM. The overall DREEM score was 128.9/200, which is a positive result based on the developers' descriptors and comparable to other health science education programs. Four individual items of concern were identified by students.

Conclusions: In this setting the DREEM was a reliable and valid tool to measure veterinary students' perceptions of their learning environment. The four items identified as concerning originated from four of the five subscales, but all related to workload. Negative perceptions regarding workload is a common concern of students in health education programs. If not addressed, this perception may have an unfavourable impact on veterinary students' learning environment.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Hodgson JL, Pelzer JM, Inzana KD. Beyond NAVMEC: competency-based veterinary education and assessment of the professional competencies. J Vet Med Educ. 2013;40(2):102–118. doi: 10.3138/jvme.1012-092R. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Bok H,GJ, Jaarsma D,ADC, Teunissen PW, van der Vleuten CPM, van Buekelen P. Development and validation of a competency framework for veterinarians. J Vet Med Educ. 2011;38(3):262–269. doi: 10.3138/jvme.38.3.262. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Betts J, Granstrom DE, Green EM, Krehbiel JD, Lawrence J, McCrystle D, Osburn BI, Reed WM, Thomas RM. The North American Veterinary Medical Education Consortium (NAVMEC) looks to veterinary education for the future: “Roadmap for veterinary medical education in the 21st century: responsive, collaborative, flexible”. J Vet Med Educ. 2011;38(4):320–327.
    1. Ruohoniemi M, Lindblom-Ylanne S. Students’ experiences concerning workload and factors enhancing and impeding their learning - a useful resource for quality enhancement in teaching and curriculum planning. Int J Acad Devel. 2009;14(1):69–81. doi: 10.1080/13601440802659494. - DOI
    1. Parkinson TJ, Gilling M, Suddaby GT. Workload, study methods, and motivation of students within a BVSc program. J Vet Med Educ. 2006;33(2):253–265. doi: 10.3138/jvme.33.2.253. - DOI - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources