Assessing the dosimetric impact of real-time prostate motion during volumetric modulated arc therapy
- PMID: 24661670
- PMCID: PMC4088267
- DOI: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2013.12.015
Assessing the dosimetric impact of real-time prostate motion during volumetric modulated arc therapy
Abstract
Purpose: To develop a method for dose reconstruction by incorporating the interplay effect between aperture modulation and target motion, and to assess the dosimetric impact of real-time prostate motion during volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT).
Methods and materials: Clinical VMAT plans were delivered with the TrueBeam linac for 8 patients with prostate cancer. The real-time target motion during dose delivery was determined based on the 2-dimensional fiducial localization using an onboard electronic portal imaging device. The target shift in each image was correlated with the control point with the same gantry angle in the VMAT plan. An in-house-developed Monte Carlo simulation tool was used to calculate the 3-dimensional dose distribution for each control point individually, taking into account the corresponding real-time target motion (assuming a nondeformable target with no rotation). The delivered target dose was then estimated by accumulating the dose from all control points in the plan. On the basis of this information, dose-volume histograms and 3-dimensional dose distributions were calculated to assess their degradation from the planned dose caused by target motion. Thirty-two prostate motion trajectories were analyzed.
Results: The minimum dose to 0.03 cm(3) of the gross tumor volume (D0.03cc) was only slightly degraded after taking motion into account, with a minimum value of 94.1% of the planned dose among all patients and fractions. However, the gross tumor volume receiving prescription dose (V100%) could be largely affected by motion, dropping below 60% in 1 trajectory. We did not observe a correlation between motion magnitude and dose degradation.
Conclusions: Prostate motion degrades the delivered dose to the target in an unpredictable way, although its effect is reduced over multiple fractions, and for most patients the degradation is small. Patients with greater prostate motion or those treated with stereotactic body radiation therapy would benefit from real-time prostate tracking to reduce the margin.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Conflict of interest statement
Conflict of interest: none.
Figures




References
-
- Bortfeld T, Jiang SB, Rietzel E. Effects of motion on the total dose distribution. Semin Radiat Oncol. 2004;14:41–51. - PubMed
-
- Naqvi SA, D’Souza WD. A stochastic convolution/superposition method with isocenter sampling to evaluate interfraction motion effects in IMRT. Med Phys. 2005;32:1156–1163. - PubMed
-
- Waghorn BJ, Shah AP, Ngwa W, et al. A computational method for estimating the dosimetric effect of intra-fraction motion on step-and-shoot IMRT and compensator plans. Phys Med Biol. 2010;55:4187–4202. - PubMed
-
- Litzenberg D, Hadley SW, Tyagi N, et al. Synchronized dynamic dose reconstruction. Med Phys. 2007;34:91–102. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical