Effects of a dietary sweetener on growth performance and health of stressed beef calves and on diet digestibility and plasma and urinary metabolite concentrations of healthy calves
- PMID: 24663208
- DOI: 10.2527/jas.2013-6795
Effects of a dietary sweetener on growth performance and health of stressed beef calves and on diet digestibility and plasma and urinary metabolite concentrations of healthy calves
Abstract
Two experiments were conducted to explore the effects of a sodium saccharin-based dietary sweetener (Sucram) on growth performance, health, and physiological responses of feedlot steers. In Exp. 1, 173 newly-received male calves purchased from auction barns were fed 0, 100, 200, or 300 g of Sucram/t of DM over 56 d. Overall, ADG and G:F (P > 0.10) were not different among treatments, but steers receiving 200 g Sucram/t displayed numerically greater ADG (23%). In addition, DMI was 17% greater for steers receiving 200 g of Sucram/t compared to steers fed the control diet (cubic effect, P = 0.09). The morbidity rate for respiratory disease did not differ (P > 0.50) among treatments. In Exp. 2, 15 steers (initial BW = 261 ± 28 kg) were used to evaluate the effects of Sucram on apparent total tract digestibility, plasma metabolite concentrations, and urine monoamine metabolite concentrations. Treatments consisted of ad libitum access to a 60% concentrate diet (Control), ad libitum access to Control + 200 g of Sucram/t of DM (Adlib), and Control + 200 g of Sucram/t of DM with feed intake paired to the Control (Paired). By design, steer DMI during the metabolism period did not differ (P = 0.34) between Paired and Control, but DMI tended (P = 0.14) to be 8.2% greater for Adlib than for Control. Treatments did not alter (P > 0.17) apparent total tract nutrient digestibility. Postprandial plasma citrulline concentration was lower (P = 0.03) for Adlib than for Control and tended to be lower (P = 0.13) for Paired than for Control. Plasma homocysteine concentration was reduced (P < 0.03) by feeding Sucram. Urinary concentrations of ethylmalonic acid, vanillymandelic acid, and 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid were greater (P < 0.06) for Adlib than for Control; Paired steers had a greater (P = 0.02) urine vanillymandelic acid concentration than Control steers and tended (P < 0.12) to have a greater urinary concentration of ethylmalonic and 5-hydroxyindolacetic acid than Control steers. Serum insulin was greater for Adlib than for Control steers (P = 0.04) and tended to be greater for Paired than for Control steers (P = 0.14), but serum prolactin area did not differ (P > 0.22) among treatments. Supplementation with Sucram may increase feed intake by newly-received, stressed feedlot calves. Saccharin supplementation reduced plasma homocysteine and increased urinary excretion of vanillymandelic acid, suggesting an improved activity of the dopamine reward system.
Similar articles
-
Effects of an artificial sweetener on health, performance, and dietary preference of feedlot cattle.J Anim Sci. 2006 Sep;84(9):2491-500. doi: 10.2527/jas.2006-098. J Anim Sci. 2006. PMID: 16908654 Clinical Trial.
-
Effects of camelina meal supplementation on ruminal forage degradability, performance, and physiological responses of beef cattle.J Anim Sci. 2012 Nov;90(11):4042-54. doi: 10.2527/jas.2011-4664. Epub 2012 May 14. J Anim Sci. 2012. PMID: 22585784
-
Effect of essential oils, tylosin, and monensin on finishing steer performance, carcass characteristics, liver abscesses, ruminal fermentation, and digestibility.J Anim Sci. 2009 Jul;87(7):2346-54. doi: 10.2527/jas.2008-1493. Epub 2009 Apr 9. J Anim Sci. 2009. PMID: 19359504 Clinical Trial.
-
Impact of nutritional programming on the growth, health, and sexual development of bull calves.Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2016 Jul;56 Suppl:S180-90. doi: 10.1016/j.domaniend.2016.02.006. Domest Anim Endocrinol. 2016. PMID: 27345315 Review.
-
Physiological changes and digestive capabilities of newly received feedlot cattle.J Anim Sci. 1999 May;77(5):1113-9. doi: 10.2527/1999.7751113x. J Anim Sci. 1999. PMID: 10340577 Review.
Cited by
-
Evaluating the Effects of Non-Nutritive Sweeteners on Pigs: A Systematic Review.Animals (Basel). 2024 Oct 19;14(20):3032. doi: 10.3390/ani14203032. Animals (Basel). 2024. PMID: 39457961 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Diet Preference, Feed Efficiency and Expression of the Sodium-Dependent Glucose Transporter Isoform 1 and Sweet Taste Receptors in the Jejunum of Lambs Supplemented with Different Flavours.Animals (Basel). 2023 Apr 20;13(8):1417. doi: 10.3390/ani13081417. Animals (Basel). 2023. PMID: 37106980 Free PMC article.
-
The Association Between Artificial Sweeteners and Obesity.Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017 Nov 21;19(12):64. doi: 10.1007/s11894-017-0602-9. Curr Gastroenterol Rep. 2017. PMID: 29159583 Review.
-
Artificial sweeteners and metabolic dysregulation: Lessons learned from agriculture and the laboratory.Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2016 Jun;17(2):179-86. doi: 10.1007/s11154-016-9372-1. Rev Endocr Metab Disord. 2016. PMID: 27387506 Review.
-
Dietary saccharin sodium supplementation improves the production performance of dairy goats without residue in milk in summer.Anim Nutr. 2024 Jun 8;18:166-176. doi: 10.1016/j.aninu.2024.04.018. eCollection 2024 Sep. Anim Nutr. 2024. PMID: 39263440 Free PMC article.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources