Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar;41(2):171-3.
doi: 10.5999/aps.2014.41.2.171. Epub 2014 Mar 12.

A preoperative marking template for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap perforators in breast reconstruction

Affiliations

A preoperative marking template for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flap perforators in breast reconstruction

Benjamin H Miranda et al. Arch Plast Surg. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Preoperative perforator marking for deep inferior epigastric artery perforator flaps is vital to the success of the procedure in breast reconstruction. Advances in imaging have facilitated accurate identification and preselection of potentially useful perforators. However, the reported imaging accuracy may be lost when preoperatively marking the patient, due to 'mapping errors', as this relies on the use of 2 reported vectors from a landmark such as the umbilicus. Observation errors have been encountered where inaccurate perforator vector measurements have been reported in relation to the umbilicus. Transcription errors have been noted where confusing and wordy reports have been typed or where incorrect units have been given (millimetres vs. centimetres). Interpretation errors have also occurred when using the report for preoperative marking. Furthermore, the marking process may be unnecessarily time-consuming. We describe a bespoke template, created using an individual computed tomography angiography image, that increases the efficiency and accuracy of preoperative marking. The template is created to scale, is individually tailored to the patient, and is particularly useful in cases where multiple potential suitable perforators exist.

Keywords: Breast neoplasms; Free tissue flaps; Mastectomy; Perforator flaps; Tomography, X-ray computed.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Coronal computed tomography angiography, generated by radiology, with marked midline and umbilical axes (green lines) and perforators (blue arrows) (scale=5 cm, 1 cm2 grid) There were 2 perforators on the left and 2 on the right hemi-abdomen, all perforating the rectus sheath: a 1.0-mm calibre subcutaneous segment perforator 31 mm lateral and 18 mm inferior to the umbilicus on the right side (blue arrow), a 0.7-mm subcutaneous segment perforator 53 mm lateral and 19 mm inferior to the centre of the umbilicus on the right side (not marked), a 1.0-mm subcutaneous segment perforator 38 mm lateral and 45 mm inferior to the centre of the umbilicus on the left (blue arrow) and a 1.1-mm subcutaneous segment perforator 53 mm lateral and 26 mm inferior to the centre of the umbilicus (blue arrow).
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Acetate print reproduction of generated computed tomography angiography image (to scale) The 3 largest perforators, which were marked radiologically (arrows), have been cut out of the acetate by using a 3.0-mm biopsy punch (Stiefel Laboratories Inc., North Carolina, USA).
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Preoperative marking process The 'punched' acetate is laid onto the abdomen, also marked pre-operatively from sternal notch to pubic symphysis, carefully centred at the umbilicus and lined up with the patient's midline. The perforator sites are marked directly onto the abdomen through the punched holes.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Completed preoperative marking After acetate removal, the most suitable perforator is quickly selected using a hand-held Doppler in preparation for surgery.

References

    1. Koshima I, Soeda S. Inferior epigastric artery skin flaps without rectus abdominis muscle. Br J Plast Surg. 1989;42:645–648. - PubMed
    1. Hamdi M, Van Landuyt K, Van Hedent E, et al. Advances in autogenous breast reconstruction: the role of preoperative perforator mapping. Ann Plast Surg. 2007;58:18–26. - PubMed
    1. Akhavani M, Sadri A, Ovens L, et al. The use of a template to accurately position the inframammary fold in breast reconstruction. J Plast Reconstr Aesthet Surg. 2011;64:e259–e261. - PubMed
    1. Tregaskiss A, Vermaak PV, Boulton R, et al. The template technique for breast mound planning when using abdominal flaps for breast reconstruction. Breast. 2012;21:686–689. - PubMed