Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Mar 25:14:27.
doi: 10.1186/1475-2867-14-27. eCollection 2014.

The impact of COX-2 on invasion of osteosarcoma cell and its mechanism of regulation

Affiliations

The impact of COX-2 on invasion of osteosarcoma cell and its mechanism of regulation

Xing Wu et al. Cancer Cell Int. .

Abstract

Background: Recently, cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) has become an important new target in the field of tumor metastasis. However, the relationship between COX-2 gene expression and the behavior of osteosarcoma metastasis is largely unknown. The study is to investigate how antisense oligonucleotides (ODNs) of COX-2 inhibit the invasion of human osteosarcoma cell line OS-732 and their mechanism of regulation.

Methods: A COX-2 antisense oligonucleotide was designed, synthesized, and transfected into OS-732 human osteosarcoma cells. RT-PCR and western blotting were performed to determine the transfection efficiency. A modified Boyden-transwell assay was used to measure the inhibition rate of tumor cell invasion. In OS-732 cells transfected with COX-2 antisense ODNs, RT-PCR was used to examine the mRNA expression of urokinase-type plasminogen activator (uPA) and that of its receptor, uPAR.

Results: Both the mRNA and protein expression levels of COX-2 were significantly reduced when cells were transfected with COX-2 antisense ODNs, which significantly reduced the invasive ability of OS-732 cells in a dose-dependent manner. The expression levels of uPA and uPAR were also significantly reduced (p < 0.01).

Conclusion: COX-2 antisense ODNs significantly inhibited the invasion of OS-732 cells, primarily by decreasing the mRNA expression of uPA and uPAR.

Keywords: Antisense oligonucleotide; COX-2; Invasion; Osteosarcoma.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The expression of COX-2 mRNA (12 hours after transfection) a. COX-2 mRNA (488 bp) (1. The control group, 2. Lipofectin group, 3. C1 group: 100 nmol/L, 4. C2 group: 200 nmol/L, 5. C3 group: 400 nmol/L, 6. C4 group: 800 nmol/L); b. GAPDH as an internal control (330 bp).
Figure 2
Figure 2
The protein expression of COX-2 by western blotting (0.The control group, 1. Lipofectin group, 2. COX-2 AS-ODN: 100 nmol/L, 3. COX-2 AS-ODN: 400 nmol/L).
Figure 3
Figure 3
The influence of COX-2 antisense oligonucleotides on osteosarcoma cell invasion.
Figure 4
Figure 4
The number of trans-membrane cells (×200). a. The control group, b. The COX-2 AS-ODN transfection group (100 nmol/L), c. The COX-2 AS-ODN transfection group (800 nmol/L).
Figure 5
Figure 5
RT-PCR amplification: a. uPA, b. uPAR, group 0, 1, 2 and 3 (COX-2 AS-ODN at 0, 200, 400 or 800 nmol/L).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Kempf-Bielack B, Bielack SS, Jurgens H. Osteosarcoma relapse after combined modality therapy: an analysis of unselected patients in the Cooperative Osteosarcoma Study Group (COSS) J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:559–568. - PubMed
    1. Faqioli F, Biasin E, Mereuta OM, Murara M, Luksch R, Ferrari S. Poor prognosis osteosarcoma: new therapeutic approach. Bone Marrow Transplant. 2008;41(Suppl 2):S131–S134. - PubMed
    1. Zhang P, Yang Y, Zweidler-McKay PA, Hughes DP. Critical role of notch signaling in osteosarcoma invasion and metastasis. Clin Cancer Res. 2008;14:2962–2969. doi: 10.1158/1078-0432.CCR-07-1992. - DOI - PMC - PubMed
    1. Dannenberg AJ, Lippman SM, Mann JR. Cyclooxygenase-2 and epidermal growth actor receptor: pharmacologic targets for chemoprevention. J Clin Oncol. 2005;23:254–266. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2005.09.112. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Blanke C. Role of COX-2 inhibitors in cancer therapy. Cancer Invest. 2004;22:271–282. doi: 10.1081/CNV-120030216. - DOI - PubMed