Gender differences in publication productivity, academic position, career duration, and funding among U.S. academic radiation oncology faculty
- PMID: 24667510
- PMCID: PMC4378901
- DOI: 10.1097/ACM.0000000000000229
Gender differences in publication productivity, academic position, career duration, and funding among U.S. academic radiation oncology faculty
Abstract
Purpose: This study aimed to analyze gender differences in rank, career duration, publication productivity, and research funding among radiation oncologists at U.S. academic institutions.
Method: For 82 domestic academic radiation oncology departments, the authors identified current faculty and recorded their academic rank, degree, and gender. The authors recorded bibliographic metrics for physician faculty from a commercially available database (Scopus, Elsevier BV), including numbers of publications from 1996 to 2012 and h-indices. The authors then concatenated these data with National Institutes of Health (NIH) funding per Research Portfolio Online Reporting Tools. The authors performed descriptive and correlative analyses, stratifying by gender and rank.
Results: Of 1,031 faculty, 293 (28%) women and 738 (72%) men, men had a higher median m-index, 0.58 (range 0-3.23) versus 0.47 (0-2.5) (P < .05); h-index, 8 (0-59) versus 5 (0-39) (P < .05); and publication number, 26 (0-591) versus 13 (0-306) (P < .05). Men were more likely to be senior faculty and receive NIH funding. After stratifying for rank, these differences were largely nonsignificant. On multivariate analysis, there were correlations between gender, career duration and academic position, and h-index (P < .01).
Conclusions: Determinants of a successful career in academic medicine are multifactorial. Data from radiation oncologists show a systematic gender association, with fewer women achieving senior faculty rank. However, women achieving seniority have productivity metrics comparable to those of male counterparts. This suggests that early career development and mentorship of female faculty may narrow productivity disparities.
Figures
References
-
- Jolliff L, Leadley J, Coakley E, Sloane RA. Women in U.S. Academic Medicine and Science: Statistics and Benchmarking Report 2011-2012. [Accessed 03/13/2013]; https://members.aamc.org/eweb/upload/Women%20in%20U%20S%20%20Academic%20....
-
- Jagsi R, Guancial EA, Worobey C, et al. The “gender gap” in authorship of academic medical literature – a 35-year perspective. N Engl J Med. 2006;355(3):281–287. - PubMed
-
- Jagsi R, Griffith KA, Stewart A, et al. Gender differences in the salaries of physician researchers. JAMA. 2012;307(22):2410–2417. - PubMed
-
- Jagsi R, Motomura AR, Griffith KA, et al. Sex differences in attainment of independent funding by career development awardees. Ann Intern Med. 2009;151:804–811. - PubMed
-
- Ley TJ, Hamilton BH. The gender gap in NIH grant applications. Science. 2008;322:1472–1474. - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
