The evolutionary biology of musical rhythm: was Darwin wrong?
- PMID: 24667562
- PMCID: PMC3965380
- DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.1001821
The evolutionary biology of musical rhythm: was Darwin wrong?
Erratum in
- PLoS Biol. 2014 May;12(5):e1001873
Abstract
In The Descent of Man, Darwin speculated that our capacity for musical rhythm reflects basic aspects of brain function broadly shared among animals. Although this remains an appealing idea, it is being challenged by modern cross-species research. This research hints that our capacity to synchronize to a beat, i.e., to move in time with a perceived pulse in a manner that is predictive and flexible across a broad range of tempi, may be shared by only a few other species. Is this really the case? If so, it would have important implications for our understanding of the evolution of human musicality.
Conflict of interest statement
The author has declared that no competing interests exist.
Figures
References
-
- Conard NJ, Malina M, Münzel SC (2009) New flutes document the earliest musical tradition in southwestern Germany. Nature 460: 737–740. - PubMed
-
- Morley I (2013) The prehistory of music. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
-
- Nettl B, Stone R (1998) The Garland encyclopedia of world music (10 vols). New York: Garland Publications.
-
- Brown S, Jordania J (2013) Universals in the world's musics. Psychol Music 41: 229–248.
-
- Nettl B (2000) An ethnomusicologist contemplates universals in musical sound and musical culture. In: Wallin NL, Merker B, Brown S, editors. The origins of music. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press. pp. 463–472.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
