Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 May;16(5):290.
doi: 10.1007/s11940-014-0290-9.

Absence Epilepsy: Older vs Newer AEDs

Affiliations

Absence Epilepsy: Older vs Newer AEDs

Jeffrey R Tenney et al. Curr Treat Options Neurol. 2014 May.

Abstract

Over the last one to two decades, several new antiepileptic drugs (AEDs) have become available. These medications have different mechanisms of action, metabolism, efficacy, and side effect profiles. Hence, it has become possible to customize medications for a particular patient. It has also become possible to use various combinations of treatments for refractory epilepsies. As medication options have increased, our goal has shifted to not only to maximize seizure control but also to minimize side effects. However, the older AEDs are still widely used. So the question arises-are newer medications better than older AEDs for the treatment of absence epilepsy? Based on a large multicenter class I study, older AEDs-ethosuximide and valproic acid-are more efficacious than newer AEDs. Due to reduced side effects, ethosuximide remains the first line treatment for childhood absence epilepsy.

PubMed Disclaimer

Similar articles

References

    1. Epilepsia. 2001 Apr;42(4):464-75 - PubMed
    1. Eur Neurol. 1997;37(3):169-75 - PubMed
    1. Epileptic Disord. 2007 Dec;9(4):353-412 - PubMed
    1. Epilepsia. 2008 Mar;49(3):425-30 - PubMed
    1. Brain Dev. 1999 Jul;21(5):303-6 - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources