Changes in implementation of two evidence-based psychotherapies for PTSD in VA residential treatment programs: a national investigation
- PMID: 24668757
- PMCID: PMC4036220
- DOI: 10.1002/jts.21902
Changes in implementation of two evidence-based psychotherapies for PTSD in VA residential treatment programs: a national investigation
Abstract
There has been little investigation of the natural course of evidence-based treatments (EBTs) over time following the draw-down of initial implementation efforts. Thus, we undertook qualitative interviews with the providers at 38 U.S. Department of Veterans Affairs' residential treatment programs for posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) to understand implementation and adaptation of 2 EBTs, prolonged exposure (PE), and cognitive processing therapy (CPT), at 2 time points over a 4-year period. The number of providers trained in the therapies and level of training improved over time. At baseline, of the 179 providers eligible per VA training requirements, 65 (36.4%) had received VA training in PE and 111 (62.0%) in CPT with 17 (9.5%) completing case consultation or becoming national trainers in both PE and CPT. By follow-up, of the increased number of 190 eligible providers, 87 (45.8%) had received VA training in PE and 135 (71.1%) in CPT, with 69 (36.3%) and 81 (42.6%) achieving certification, respectively. Twenty-two programs (57.9%) reported no change in PE use between baseline and follow-up, whereas 16 (42.1%) reported an increase. Twenty-four (63.2%) programs reported no change in their use of CPT between baseline and follow-up, 12 (31.6%) programs experienced an increase, and 2 (5.2%) programs experienced a decrease in use. A significant number of providers indicated that they made modifications to the manuals (e.g., tailoring, lengthening). Reasons for adaptations are discussed. The need to dedicate time and resources toward the implementation of EBTs is noted.
Published 2014. This article is a US Government work and is in the public domain in the USA.
References
-
- Aarons GA, Palinkas LA. Implementation of evidence based practice in child welfare: Service provider perspectives. Administration and Policy in Mental Health. 2007;34:411–419. doi:10.1007/s10488-007-0121-3. - PubMed
-
- Blasinsky M, Goldman HH, Unutzer J. Project IMPACT: A report on barriers and facilitators to sustainability. Administrative Policy Mental Health & Mental Health Service Research. 2006;33:718–729. doi:10.1007/s10488-006-0086-7. - PubMed
-
- Borntrager CF, Chorpita BF, Higa-McMillan C, Weisz JR. Provider attitudes toward evidence-based practices: Are the concerns withthe evidence or with the manuals? Psychiatric Services. 2009;60:677–681. doi:10.1176/appi.ps.60.5.677. - PubMed
-
- Brekke JS, Phillips E, Pancake LOA, Lewis J, Duke J. Implementation practice and implementation research: A report from the field. Research on Social Work Practice. 2009;19:592–601. doi:10.1177/1049731509335561.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
