A Qualitative Study of Phase III Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment Decision-Making: Perspectives from Adolescents, Young Adults, Caregivers, and Providers
- PMID: 24669354
- PMCID: PMC3955960
- DOI: 10.1089/jayao.2013.0011
A Qualitative Study of Phase III Cancer Clinical Trial Enrollment Decision-Making: Perspectives from Adolescents, Young Adults, Caregivers, and Providers
Abstract
Purpose: The mortality reduction rate for adolescents and young adults (AYAs) with cancer has not demonstrated the same rate of improvement as for children, due partly to insufficient phase III cancer clinical trial enrollment. This study describes three key components of phase III cancer clinical trial enrollment-family decision-making patterns, factors that influence AYAs' involvement, and attitudes (perceived barriers and benefits) toward trial participation-and evaluated a measure of attitudes. Methods: Participants were AYAs (15-23 years old at study) diagnosed with cancer and offered a phase III cancer clinical trial within the past 3-21 months, their primary caregivers, and their healthcare providers. Interviews assessed: (a) phase III clinical trial decision-making experiences and (b) relevance of the Pediatric Research Participation Questionnaire (PRPQ) in the assessment of AYAs' attitudes toward enrollment on phase III cancer clinical trials. Results: Thirteen AYAs, 16 caregivers, and 11 providers were interviewed. Four decision-making patterns were identified, with AYA abdicates to caregiver and caregiver-based and AYA-endorsed the most commonly described, but with variation across respondents. Distress and reduced health-related quality of life limited AYAs' involvement in the enrollment decision, while developmental and emotional maturity facilitated involvement. Perceived barriers and benefits to enrollment were reported, and the PRPQ was deemed relevant with minor modifications. Conclusions: Findings suggest that AYAs may not be fully involved in phase III cancer clinical trial enrollment decision-making, and caregivers and providers are challenged to overcome factors that limit their involvement. The PRPQ shows promise as a tool for systematically evaluating clinical trial attitudes.
Keywords: attitudes to clinical trials; clinical trial participation; perceived barriers and benefits to research; treatment decision-making.
Similar articles
-
Evaluation of the Pediatric Research Participation Questionnaire for Measuring Attitudes Toward Cancer Clinical Trials Among Adolescents and Young Adults.J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2019 Aug;8(4):423-433. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0144. Epub 2019 Apr 26. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31025898 Free PMC article.
-
3 Dimensions of Treatment Decision Making in Adolescents and Young Adults With Cancer.Cancer Nurs. 2020 Nov/Dec;43(6):436-445. doi: 10.1097/NCC.0000000000000820. Cancer Nurs. 2020. PMID: 33084293 Free PMC article.
-
Multimethod Assessment of Medication Nonadherence and Barriers in Adolescents and Young Adults With Solid Organ Transplants.J Pediatr Psychol. 2018 Aug 1;43(7):789-799. doi: 10.1093/jpepsy/jsy016. J Pediatr Psychol. 2018. PMID: 29562247
-
Adolescent angst: enrollment on clinical trials.Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2018 Nov 30;2018(1):154-160. doi: 10.1182/asheducation-2018.1.154. Hematology Am Soc Hematol Educ Program. 2018. PMID: 30504304 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Systematic review of barriers and facilitators to clinical trial enrollment among adolescents and young adults with cancer: Identifying opportunities for intervention.Cancer. 2020 Mar 1;126(5):949-957. doi: 10.1002/cncr.32675. Epub 2019 Dec 23. Cancer. 2020. PMID: 31869454 Free PMC article.
Cited by
-
Evaluation of the Pediatric Research Participation Questionnaire for Measuring Attitudes Toward Cancer Clinical Trials Among Adolescents and Young Adults.J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2019 Aug;8(4):423-433. doi: 10.1089/jayao.2018.0144. Epub 2019 Apr 26. J Adolesc Young Adult Oncol. 2019. PMID: 31025898 Free PMC article.
-
Employing effective recruitment and retention strategies to engage a diverse pediatric population in genomics research.Am J Hum Genet. 2024 Dec 5;111(12):2607-2617. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2024.10.015. Epub 2024 Nov 19. Am J Hum Genet. 2024. PMID: 39566494 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions of and decision making about clinical trials in adolescent and young adults with Cancer: a qualitative analysis.BMC Cancer. 2018 Jun 4;18(1):629. doi: 10.1186/s12885-018-4515-2. BMC Cancer. 2018. PMID: 29866065 Free PMC article.
-
Barriers and Facilitators to Adolescent and Young Adult Cancer Trial Enrollment: NCORP Site Perspectives.JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021 Mar 22;5(3):pkab027. doi: 10.1093/jncics/pkab027. eCollection 2021 Jun. JNCI Cancer Spectr. 2021. PMID: 34104866 Free PMC article.
-
Perceptions and attitudes toward clinical trials in adolescent and young adults with cancer: a systematic review.Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2018 Jun 13;9:87-94. doi: 10.2147/AHMT.S163121. eCollection 2018. Adolesc Health Med Ther. 2018. PMID: 29942170 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Bleyer A, O'Leary M, Barr R, Ries LAG. (Eds). Cancer epidemiology in older adolescents and young adults 15–29 years of age, including SEER incidence and survival, 1975–2000 (NIH Publication No. 06-5767). Bethesda, MD: National Cancer Institute; 2006
-
- Bleyer WA. Cancer in older adolescents and young adults: epidemiology, diagnosis, treatment, survival, and importance of clinical trials. Med Pediatr Oncol. 2002;38(1):1–10 - PubMed
-
- Burke ME, Albritton K, Marina N. Challenges in the recruitment of adolescents and young adults to cancer clinical trials. Cancer. 2007;110(11): 2385–93 - PubMed
-
- Ferrari A, Bleyer A. Participation of adolescents with cancer in clinical trials. Cancer Treat Rev. 2007;33(7):603–8 - PubMed
-
- Bleyer WA, Tejeda H, Murphy SB, et al. . National cancer clinical trials: children have equal access; adolescents do not. J Adolesc Health. 1997;21(6):366–73 - PubMed
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Miscellaneous