Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Mar 26:14:136.
doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-136.

Elements of effective palliative care models: a rapid review

Affiliations
Review

Elements of effective palliative care models: a rapid review

Tim Luckett et al. BMC Health Serv Res. .

Abstract

Background: Population ageing, changes to the profiles of life-limiting illnesses and evolving societal attitudes prompt a critical evaluation of models of palliative care. We set out to identify evidence-based models of palliative care to inform policy reform in Australia.

Method: A rapid review of electronic databases and the grey literature was undertaken over an eight week period in April-June 2012. We included policy documents and comparative studies from countries within the Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development (OECD) published in English since 2001. Meta-analysis was planned where >1 study met criteria; otherwise, synthesis was narrative using methods described by Popay et al. (2006).

Results: Of 1,959 peer-reviewed articles, 23 reported systematic reviews, 9 additional RCTs and 34 non-randomised comparative studies. Variation in the content of models, contexts in which these were implemented and lack of detailed reporting meant that elements of models constituted a more meaningful unit of analysis than models themselves. Case management was the element most consistently reported in models for which comparative studies provided evidence for effectiveness. Essential attributes of population-based palliative care models identified by policy and addressed by more than one element were communication and coordination between providers (including primary care), skill enhancement, and capacity to respond rapidly to individuals' changing needs and preferences over time.

Conclusion: Models of palliative care should integrate specialist expertise with primary and community care services and enable transitions across settings, including residential aged care. The increasing complexity of care needs, services, interventions and contextual drivers warrants future research aimed at elucidating the interactions between different components and the roles played by patient, provider and health system factors. The findings of this review are limited by its rapid methodology and focus on model elements relevant to Australia's health system.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Flowchart for inclusion of articles reporting evaluative studies identified through searches of electronic databases.

References

    1. Ahmedzai SH, Costa A, Blengini C, Bosch A, Sanz-Ortiz J, Ventafridda V, Verhagen SC. International working group convened by the European School of O. A new international framework for palliative care. Eur J Cancer. 2004;14(15):2192–2200. doi: 10.1016/j.ejca.2004.06.009. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Watson M, Watson M. Changing emphasis in end-of-life care. Br J Hosp Med (Lond) 2010;14(1):6–7. - PubMed
    1. Doron I. Caring for the dying: from a "negative" to a "positive" legal right to die at home. Care Manag J. 2005;14(1):22–28. doi: 10.1891/cmaj.2005.6.1.22. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Phillips JL, Currow DC. Cancer as a chronic disease. Collegian. 2010;14:47–50. doi: 10.1016/j.colegn.2010.04.007. - DOI - PubMed
    1. Deeks SG, Lewin SR, Havlir DV. The end of AIDS: HIV infection as a chronic disease. Lancet. 2013;14(9903):1525–1533. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(13)61809-7. - DOI - PMC - PubMed

Publication types