Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014:2014:930953.
doi: 10.1155/2014/930953. Epub 2014 Feb 11.

A single centre experience of first "one hundred laparoscopic liver resections"

Affiliations

A single centre experience of first "one hundred laparoscopic liver resections"

S Rehman et al. HPB Surg. 2014.

Abstract

Background. Laparoscopic liver resection (LLR) has emerged as an alternative procedure to open liver resection in selected patients. The purpose of this study was to describe our initial experience of 100 patients undergoing LLR. Methods. We analysed a prospectively maintained hepatobiliary database of 100 patients who underwent LLR between August 2007 and August 2012. Clinicopathological data were reviewed to evaluate surgical outcomes following LLR. Results. The median age was 64 and median BMI 27. Patients had a liver resection for either malignant lesions (n = 74) or benign lesions (n = 26). Commonly performed procedures were segmentectomy/metastectomy (n = 55), left lateral sectionectomy (LLS) (n = 26), or major hepatectomy (n = 19). Complete LLR was performed in 84 patients, 9 were converted to open and 7 hand-assisted. The most common indications were CRLM (n = 62), followed by hepatic adenoma (n = 9) or hepatocellular carcinoma (n = 7). The median operating time was 240 minutes and median blood loss was 250 mL. Major postoperative complications occurred in 9 patients. The median length of stay (LOS) was 5 days. One patient died within 30 days of liver resection. Conclusions. LLR is a safe and oncologically feasible procedure with comparable short-term perioperative outcomes to the open approach. However, further studies are necessary to determine long-term oncological outcomes.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Overall survival for CRLM after LLR.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Gagner M, Rheault M, Dubuc J. Laparoscopic partial hepatectomy for liver tumour. Surgical Endoscopy. 1992;6:p. 99.
    1. Gagner M, Rogula T, Selzer D. Laparoscopic liver resection: benefits and controversies. Surgical Clinics of North America. 2004;84(2):451–462. - PubMed
    1. Nguyen KT, Gamblin TC, Geller DA. World review of laparoscopic liver resection-2804 patients. Annals of Surgery. 2009;250(5):831–841. - PubMed
    1. Buell JF, Cherqui D, Geller DA, et al. The international position on laparoscopic liver surgery: The Louisville Statement, 2008. Annals of Surgery. 2009;250(5):825–830. - PubMed
    1. Cherqui D, Husson E, Hammoud R, et al. Laparoscopic liver resections: a feasibility study in 30 patients. Annals of Surgery. 2000;232(6):753–762. - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources