Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jan 28:2014:406159.
doi: 10.1155/2014/406159. eCollection 2014.

Spinal fusion in the next generation: gene and cell therapy approaches

Affiliations
Review

Spinal fusion in the next generation: gene and cell therapy approaches

Marta Barba et al. ScientificWorldJournal. .

Abstract

Bone fusion represents a challenge in the orthopedics practice, being especially indicated for spine disorders. Spinal fusion can be defined as the bony union between two vertebral bodies obtained through the surgical introduction of an osteoconductive, osteoinductive, and osteogenic compound. Autogenous bone graft provides all these three qualities and is considered the gold standard. However, a high morbidity is associated with the harvest procedure. Intensive research efforts have been spent during the last decades to develop new approaches and technologies for successful spine fusion. In recent years, cell and gene therapies have attracted great interest from the scientific community. The improved knowledge of both mesenchymal stem cell biology and osteogenic molecules allowed their use in regenerative medicine, representing attractive approaches to achieve bone regeneration also in spinal surgery applications. In this review we aim to describe the developing gene- and cell-based bone regenerative approaches as promising future trends in spine fusion.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Spinal fusion clinical trials. Graphical view of the 304 clinical trials from http://www.clinicaltrials.gov/; 91 of these are open (a). In particular, spinal fusion clinical trials based on stem cell-therapy are 15; 1 of these is open (b).

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Etminan M, Girardi FP, Khan SN, Cammisa FP., Jr. Revision strategies for lumbar pseudarthrosis. Orthopedic Clinics of North America. 2002;33(2):381–392. - PubMed
    1. Boden SD. Overview of the biology of lumbar spine fusion and principles for selecting a bone graft substitute. Spine. 2002;27(16):S26–S31. - PubMed
    1. Minamide A, Kawakami M, Hashizume H, Sakata R, Tamaki T. Evaluation of carriers of bone morphogenetic protein for spinal fusion. Spine. 2001;26(8):933–939. - PubMed
    1. Rawlinson JN. Morbidity after anterior cervical decompression and fusion. The influence of the donor site on recovery, and the results of a trial of surgibone compared to autologous bone. Acta Neurochirurgica. 1994;131(1-2):106–118. - PubMed
    1. Liao SS, Guan K, Cui FZ, Shi SS, Sun TS. Lumbar spinal fusion with a mineralized collagen matrix and rhBMP-2 in a rabbit model. Spine. 2003;28(17):1954–1960. - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources