Ambulatory cardiac monitoring for discharged emergency department patients with possible cardiac arrhythmias
- PMID: 24672611
- PMCID: PMC3966438
- DOI: 10.5811/westjem.2013.11.18973
Ambulatory cardiac monitoring for discharged emergency department patients with possible cardiac arrhythmias
Abstract
Introduction: Many emergency department (ED) patients have symptoms that may be attributed to arrhythmias, necessitating outpatient ambulatory cardiac monitoring. Consensus is lacking on the optimal duration of monitoring. We describe the use of a novel device applied at ED discharge that provides continuous prolonged cardiac monitoring.
Methods: We enrolled discharged adult ED patients with symptoms of possible cardiac arrhythmia. A novel, single use continuous recording patch (Zio®Patch) was applied at ED discharge. Patients wore the device for up to 14 days or until they had symptoms to trigger an event. They then returned the device by mail for interpretation. Significant arrhythmias are defined as: ventricular tachycardia (VT) ≥4 beats, supraventricular tachycardia (SVT) ≥4 beats, atrial fibrillation, ≥3 second pause, 2nd degree Mobitz II, 3rd degree AV Block, or symptomatic bradycardia.
Results: There were 174 patients were enrolled and all mailed back their devices. The average age was 52.2 (± 21.0) years, and 55% were female. The most common indications for device placement were palpitations 44.8%, syncope 24.1% and dizziness 6.3%. Eighty-three patients (47.7%) had ≥1 arrhythmias and 17 (9.8%) were symptomatic at the time of their arrhythmia. Median time to first arrhythmia was 1.0 days (IQR 0.2-2.8) and median time to first symptomatic arrhythmia was 1.5 days (IQR 0.4-6.7). 93 (53.4%) of symptomatic patients did not have any arrhythmia during their triggered events. The overall diagnostic yield was 63.2%
Conclusion: The Zio®Patch cardiac monitoring device can efficiently characterize symptomatic patients without significant arrhythmia and has a higher diagnostic yield for arrhythmias than traditional 24-48 hour Holter monitoring. It allows for longer term monitoring up to 14 days.
Similar articles
-
Comparison of 24-hour Holter monitoring with 14-day novel adhesive patch electrocardiographic monitoring.Am J Med. 2014 Jan;127(1):95.e11-7. doi: 10.1016/j.amjmed.2013.10.003. Epub 2013 Oct 15. Am J Med. 2014. PMID: 24384108 Free PMC article.
-
Pilot evaluation of an integrated monitor-adhesive patch for long-term cardiac arrhythmia detection in India.Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2014 Jan;12(1):25-35. doi: 10.1586/14779072.2013.867807. Epub 2013 Dec 10. Expert Rev Cardiovasc Ther. 2014. PMID: 24325206
-
Incidence and timing of potentially high-risk arrhythmias detected through long term continuous ambulatory electrocardiographic monitoring.BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016 Feb 17;16:35. doi: 10.1186/s12872-016-0210-x. BMC Cardiovasc Disord. 2016. PMID: 26883019 Free PMC article.
-
Interventional electrophysiology and its role in the treatment of cardiac arrhythmia.Ann Acad Med Singap. 1998 Mar;27(2):248-54. Ann Acad Med Singap. 1998. PMID: 9663319 Review.
-
Cardiac arrhythmia detection outcomes among patients monitored with the Zio patch system: a systematic literature review.Curr Med Res Opin. 2019 Oct;35(10):1659-1670. doi: 10.1080/03007995.2019.1610370. Epub 2019 May 28. Curr Med Res Opin. 2019. PMID: 31045463
Cited by
-
A study of the clinical usefulness of the eMEMO®.J Arrhythm. 2025 Jul 9;41(4):e70137. doi: 10.1002/joa3.70137. eCollection 2025 Aug. J Arrhythm. 2025. PMID: 40636776 Free PMC article.
-
Smart Wearables for Cardiac Monitoring-Real-World Use beyond Atrial Fibrillation.Sensors (Basel). 2021 Apr 5;21(7):2539. doi: 10.3390/s21072539. Sensors (Basel). 2021. PMID: 33916371 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Wearable Devices for Ambulatory Cardiac Monitoring: JACC State-of-the-Art Review.J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020 Apr 7;75(13):1582-1592. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2020.01.046. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2020. PMID: 32241375 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Newer Diagnostic and Cost-Effective Ways to Identify Asymptomatic Atrial Fibrillation for the Prevention of Stroke.Cureus. 2021 Jan 2;13(1):e12437. doi: 10.7759/cureus.12437. Cureus. 2021. PMID: 33552757 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Prevalence and Characteristics of Subclinical Atrial Fibrillation in a Community-Dwelling Elderly Population: The ARIC Study.Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019 Oct;12(10):e007390. doi: 10.1161/CIRCEP.119.007390. Epub 2019 Oct 14. Circ Arrhythm Electrophysiol. 2019. PMID: 31607148 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Sheldon RS, Morillo CA, Krahn AD, et al. Standardized Approaches to the Investigation of Syncope: Canadian Cardiovascular Society Position Paper. Canadian Journal of Cardiology. 2011;27:246–253. - PubMed
-
- Huff SJ, Decker WW, Quinn JV, et al. Clinical Policy: Critical Issues in the Evaluation and Management of Adult Patients Presenting to the Emergency Department with Syncope. Ann Emerg Med. 2007;49:431–444. - PubMed
-
- Zimetbaum P, Josephson ME. Evaluation of Patients with Palpitations. New Engl J Med. 1998;338(19):1369–1373. - PubMed
-
- Thavendiranathan P, Bagai A, Khoo C, et al. Does This Patient with Palpitations Have a Cardiac Arrhythmia? JAMA. 2009;302(19):2135–2143. - PubMed
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical