Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Mar;8(2):117-30.
doi: 10.5009/gnl.2014.8.2.117. Epub 2014 Mar 11.

Population screening for colorectal cancer means getting FIT: the past, present, and future of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT)

Affiliations
Review

Population screening for colorectal cancer means getting FIT: the past, present, and future of colorectal cancer screening using the fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin (FIT)

James E Allison et al. Gut Liver. 2014 Mar.

Abstract

Fecal immunochemical tests for hemoglobin (FIT) are changing the manner in which colorectal cancer (CRC) is screened. Although these tests are being performed worldwide, why is this test different from its predecessors? What evidence supports its adoption? How can this evidence best be used? This review addresses these questions and provides an understanding of FIT theory and practices to expedite international efforts to implement the use of FIT in CRC screening.

Keywords: Colorectal cancer; Colorectal cancer screening; Fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin; Population screening.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

No potential conflict of interest relevant to this article was reported.

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Cartoon illustrating lateral flow immunochromatographic analysis principle of a fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin.
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
Variable positivity rates of well-trained, well-supervised, and well-monitored analysts based on their guaiac fecal occult blood test results.
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
Flow chart from invitation to detection with numbers, percentages, and 95% confidence intervals between brackets. Adapted from van Rossum LG, et al. Gastroenterology 2008;135:82-90, with permission from Elsevier. gFOBT, guaiac-based fecal occult blood test; FIT, fecal immunochemical test for hemoglobin.
Fig. 4
Fig. 4
Fecal hemoglobin concentrations in 1,000 consecutive ambulatory patients with increased risk of colorectal neoplasia or symptomatic. Adapted from Levi Z, et al. Ann Intern Med 2007;146:244-255, with permission from American College of Physicians. SD, standard deviation; CI, confidence interval.

References

    1. Potter MB. Strategies and resources to address colorectal cancer screening rates and disparities in the United States and globally. Annu Rev Public Health. 2013;34:413–429. - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Center MM, DeSantis C, Ward EM. Global patterns of cancer incidence and mortality rates and trends. Cancer Epidemiol Biomarkers Prev. 2010;19:1893–1907. - PubMed
    1. Jemal A, Bray F, Center MM, Ferlay J, Ward E, Forman D. Global cancer statistics. CA Cancer J Clin. 2011;61:69–90. - PubMed
    1. Center MM, Jemal A, Smith RA, Ward E. Worldwide variations in colorectal cancer. CA Cancer J Clin. 2009;59:366–378. - PubMed
    1. Hardcastle JD, Chamberlain JO, Robinson MH, et al. Randomised controlled trial of faecal-occult-blood screening for colorectal cancer. Lancet. 1996;348:1472–1477. - PubMed