Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Mar;6 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S173-9.
doi: 10.3978/j.issn.2072-1439.2013.10.23.

Surgical management of cardiac implantable electronic device infections

Affiliations
Review

Surgical management of cardiac implantable electronic device infections

Michael Koutentakis et al. J Thorac Dis. 2014 Mar.

Erratum in

  • J Thorac Dis. 2014 Jun;6(6):E146. Petrou, Alexandra [corrected to Petrou, Anastasios]; Priavali, Eleftheria [corrected to Priavali, Helen]; Gesouli, Eleftheria [corrected to Gesouli, Helen]; Apostolakis, Eleftheria [corrected to Apostolakis, Efstratios]

Abstract

Purpose: The infection of cardiac implantable electronic devices (CIED) is a serious and potentially lethal complication. The population at risk is growing, as the device implantation is increasing especially in older patients with associated comorbid conditions. Our purpose was to present the management of this complicated surgical condition and to extract the relevant conclusions.

Methods: During a 3-year period 1,508 CIED were implanted in our hospital. We treated six cases of permanent pacemaker infection with localized pocket infection or endocarditis. In accordance to the recent AHA/ACC guidelines, complete device removal was decided in all cases. The devices were removed under general anaesthesia, with a midline sternotomy, under extracorporeal circulation on the beating heart. Epicardial permanent pacing electrodes were placed on the right atrium and ventricle before the end of the procedure.

Results: The postoperative course of all patients was uncomplicated and after a follow up period of five years no relapse of infection occurred.

Conclusions: Management protocols that include complete device removal are the only effective measure for the eradication of CIED infections. Although newer technologies have emerged and specialized techniques of percutaneous device removal have been developed, the surgical alternative to these methods can be a safe solution in cases of infected devices.

Keywords: Cardiac device infection; cardiac surgery; endocarditis; pacemaker infection.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Management of a CIED infection must be based on the complete removal of the device (generator and leads), regardless of the extent of the infection, in combination with adequate antibiotic therapy. Infection of any part of a CIED implies contamination of the whole device.

References

    1. Margey R, McCann H, Blake G, et al. Contemporary management of and outcomes from cardiac device related infections. Europace 2010;12:64-70 - PubMed
    1. Baddour LM, Epstein AE, Erickson CC, et al. Update on cardiovascular implantable electronic device infections and their management: a scientific statement from the American Heart Association. Circulation 2010;121:458-77 - PubMed
    1. Farooqi FM, Talsania S, Hamid S, et al. Extraction of cardiac rhythm devices: indications, techniques and outcomes for the removal of pacemaker and defibrillator leads. Int J Clin Pract 2010;64:1140-7 - PubMed
    1. Jones SO, 4th, Eckart RE, Albert CM, et al. Large, single-center, single-operator experience with transvenous lead extraction: outcomes and changing indications. Heart Rhythm 2008;5:520-5 - PubMed
    1. Zhan C, Baine WB, Sedrakyan A, et al. Cardiac device implantation in the United States from 1997 through 2004: a population-based analysis. J Gen Intern Med 2008;23Suppl 1:13-9 - PMC - PubMed