Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2013 Mar 1;3(1):1-9.
doi: 10.4236/wja.2013.31001.

Topological and Historical Considerations for Infectious Disease Transmission among Injecting Drug Users in Bushwick, Brooklyn (USA)

Affiliations

Topological and Historical Considerations for Infectious Disease Transmission among Injecting Drug Users in Bushwick, Brooklyn (USA)

Kirk Dombrowski et al. World J AIDS. .

Abstract

Recent interest by physicists in social networks and disease transmission factors has prompted debate over the topology of degree distributions in sexual networks. Social network researchers have been critical of "scale-free" Barabasi-Albert approaches, and largely rejected the preferential attachment, "rich-get-richer" assumptions that underlie that model. Instead, research on sexual networks has pointed to the importance of homophily and local sexual norms in dictating degree distributions, and thus disease transmission thresholds. Injecting Drug User (IDU) network topologies may differ from the emerging models of sexual networks, however. Degree distribution analysis of a Brooklyn, NY, IDU network indicates a different topology than the spanning tree configurations discussed for sexual networks, instead featuring comparatively short cycles and high concurrency. Our findings suggest that IDU networks do in some ways conform to a "scale-free" topology, and thus may represent "reservoirs" of potential infection despite seemingly low transmission thresholds.

Keywords: Injecting Drug Users; Scale-Free Networks; Social Network Analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
The risk network of injecting drug users discovered by the SFHR project in Bushwick, Brooklyn (USA) 1991-1993.
Figure 2
Figure 2
Number of users n (y-axis) with composite MInjTot, number of partners k (x-axis).
Figure 3
Figure 3
Log/Log (base 10) graph of Figure 2.

References

    1. Albert R, Barabasi A-L. Statistical Mechanics of Complex Networks. Reviews of Modern Physics. 2002;74(1):47–97. doi:10.1103/RevModPhys.74.47.
    1. Bearman PS, Moody J, Stovel K. Chains of Affection: The Structure of Adolescent Romantic and Sexual Networks. American Journal of Sociology. 2004;110(1):44–91. doi:10.1086/386272.
    1. Friedman SR, Bolyard M, Mateu-Gelabert P, Goltzman P, Pawlowicz MP, Singh DZ, Touze G, Rossi D, Maslow C, Sandoval M, Flom PL. Some Data-Driven Reflections on Priorities in AIDS Network Research. AIDS and Behavior. 2007;11(5):641–651. - PubMed
    1. Friedman SR, Curtis R, Neaigus A, Jose B, Des Jarlais DC. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; New York: 1999. Social Networks, Drug Injectors’ Lives, and HIV/AIDS.
    1. Albert R, Jeong H, Barabasi A-L. Error and Attack Tolerance of Complex Networks. Nature. 2000;406(6794):378–382. doi:10.1038/35019019. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources