Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Jan:1308:11-32.
doi: 10.1111/nyas.12284. Epub 2013 Nov 4.

Effects of integrated child development and nutrition interventions on child development and nutritional status

Affiliations

Effects of integrated child development and nutrition interventions on child development and nutritional status

Sally M Grantham-McGregor et al. Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Jan.

Erratum in

  • Ann N Y Acad Sci. 2014 Feb;1309:63

Abstract

We conducted a systematic review of studies that examined the effect of interventions combining a child development component with a nutrition one; in some cases the nutrition interventions also included health-promotion components. Only papers with both child development and nutrition outcomes and rated as moderate-to-good quality were included. Eleven efficacy and two nonrandomized trials, and eight program evaluations were identified. Only six trials examined interventions separately and combined. The trials showed nutritional interventions usually benefited nutritional status and sometimes benefited child development. Stimulation consistently benefited child development. There was no significant loss of any effect when interventions were combined, but there was little evidence of synergistic interaction between nutrition and stimulation on child development. Only three trials followed up the children after intervention. All at-scale program evaluations were combined interventions. Five benefited child development, but one did not, and two showed deficits. There was generally little benefit of at-scale programs to nutritional status. We found no rigorous evaluations of adding stimulation to health and nutrition services at scale and there is an urgent need for them. There is also a need to establish quality-control mechanisms for existing scaled-up programs and to determine their long-term effects. There is also a need to determine if there are any sustained benefits for the children after programs finish.

Keywords: child development; integrated interventions; nutrition.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Grantham-McGregor, S. et al. 2007. Developmental potential in the first 5 years for children in developing countries. Lancet 369: 60-70.
    1. Heckman, J. & D.V. Masterov. 2005. The Productivity Argument for Investing in Young Children. Chicago: University of Chicago. Cited August 9, 2013. http://jenni.uchicago.edu/human-inequality/papers/Heckman_final_all_wp_2....
    1. Walker, S.P. et al. 2007. Child development: risk factors for adverse outcomes in developing countries. Lancet 369: 145-157.
    1. Walker, S.P. et al. 2011. Inequality begins in early childhood: risk and protective factors for early child development. Lancet 378: 1325-1338.
    1. Engle, P.L. et al. 2011. Strategies for reducing inequalities and improving developmental outcomes for young children in low-income and middle-income countries. Lancet 378: 1339-1353.

Publication types