Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Multicenter Study
. 2015 Feb;18(2):234-41.
doi: 10.1017/S1368980014000342. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

DINO (Diet In Nutrients Out) - an integrated dietary assessment system

Affiliations
Multicenter Study

DINO (Diet In Nutrients Out) - an integrated dietary assessment system

Emily Fitt et al. Public Health Nutr. 2015 Feb.

Abstract

Objective: The current paper describes Diet In Nutrients Out (DINO), an integrated dietary assessment system incorporating dietary data entry and nutritional analysis within one platform for use in dietary assessment in small-scale intervention studies to national surveys.

Design: DINO contains >6000 food items, mostly aggregated composites of branded foods, across thirty-one main food groups divided into 151 subsidiary groups for detailed reporting requirements, with fifty-three core nutrient fields.

Setting: MRC Human Nutrition Research (HNR), Cambridge, UK and MRC Keneba, Gambia.

Subjects: DINO is used across dietary assessment projects at HNR and MRC Keneba.

Results: DINO contains macro- and micronutrients as well as additional variables of current research and policy interest, such as caffeine, whole grains, vitamin K and added sugars. Disaggregated data are available for fruit, vegetables, meat, fish and cheese in composite foods, enabling greater accuracy when reporting food consumption or assessing adherence to dietary recommendations. Portion sizes are categorised in metric and imperial weights, with standardised portion sizes for each age group. Regular reviews are undertaken for portion sizes and food composition to ensure contemporary relevance. A training programme and a checking schedule are adhered to for quality assurance purposes, covering users and data. Eating context questions are integrated to record where and with whom the respondent is eating, allowing examination between these factors and the foods consumed.

Conclusions: An up-to-date quality-assured system for dietary assessment is crucial for nutritional surveillance and research, but needs to have the flexibility to be tailored to address specific research questions.

Keywords: Coding; DINO; Dietary assessment; Nutrient analysis.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Fig. 1
Fig. 1
Coding screen as displayed in the Diet In Nutrients Out (DINO) dietary assessment program, displaying the available coding fields for each food entry including food and portion size entries, together with eating context responses
Fig. 2
Fig. 2
(a) Blank food code screen in the Diet In Nutrients Out (DINO) dietary assessment program. The full food code description, unique food code number and appropriate food group are required. Nutrients are allocated by manual entry with fields highlighted as −1 representing missing or unknown values. Quality assurance checks for calculation errors are incorporated and shown in the shadow boxes alongside some nutrients. The sources tab enables documentation of data sources and additional notes to be made with each food code. (b) Blank coding food screen in the DINO dietary assessment program. Coding description is entered and a coding number automatically generated to prevent duplication. The corresponding food code is selected together with a food group to facilitate searching using food trees. Portion sizes are added and fields for gram and ounce are automatically entered. Portions are date specific, allowing amendments to be made during coding projects
Fig. 3
Fig. 3
An example of food and nutrient data output generated by the Diet In Nutrients Out (DINO) dietary assessment program. The variables included in each analysis can be specified by the user to produce tailored output, with nutrient data displayed by individual eating occasions or as mean daily intakes

References

    1. Bingham SA, Gill C, Welch A et al. (1997) Validation of dietary assessment methods in the UK arm of EPIC using weighed records, and 24-hour urinary nitrogen and potassium and serum vitamin C and carotenoids as biomarkers. Int J Epidemiol 26, Suppl. 1, S137–S151. - PubMed
    1. McKeown NM, Day NE, Welch AA et al. (2001) Use of biological markers to validate self-reported dietary intake in a random sample of the European Prospective Investigation into Cancer United Kingdom Norfolk cohort. Am J Clin Nutr 74, 188–196. - PubMed
    1. Lanigan JA, Wells JC, Lawson MS et al. (2001) Validation of food diary method for assessment of dietary energy and macronutrient intake in infants and children aged 6–24 months. Eur J Clin Nutr 55, 124–129. - PubMed
    1. Emmett P (2009) Dietary assessment in the Avon Longitudinal Study of Parents and Children. Eur J Clin Nutr 63, Suppl. 1, S38–S44. - PubMed
    1. Carroll RJ, Midthune D, Subar AF et al. (2012) Taking advantage of the strengths of 2 different dietary assessment instruments to improve intake estimates for nutritional epidemiology. Am J Epidemiol 175, 340–347. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

LinkOut - more resources