Understanding the effect of breast augmentation on quality of life: prospective analysis using the BREAST-Q
- PMID: 24675184
- DOI: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000023
Understanding the effect of breast augmentation on quality of life: prospective analysis using the BREAST-Q
Abstract
Background: The aim of this study was to prospectively evaluate patient satisfaction and quality of life with elective breast augmentation.
Methods: Patients with bilateral submuscular breast augmentations prospectively completed the BREAST-Q preoperatively and 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively; t tests compared preoperative and postoperative scores at 6 weeks and 6 months, and standard indicators of effect sizes were calculated. Logistic regression was used to evaluate the association between patient and surgical factors on satisfaction outcomes.
Results: The study sample included 611 female patients with the following characteristics: (1) mean age of 33.5 years; (2) mean body mass index of 21.7; (3) and mean implant volume of 360; with (4) 73 percent having received a silicone implant. Significant improvements were found in patient satisfaction with breasts (p < 0.001), psychosocial well-being (p < 0.001), and sexual well-being (p < 0.001) at 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively, and all were associated with a very large Kazis effect size of 3.66, 2.39, and 2.56 at 6 months, respectively. However, at both 6 weeks and 6 months postoperatively, physical well-being remained significantly below preoperative baseline scores. In addition, satisfaction with breasts and with the overall surgical experience was significantly lower among older patients (p = 0.01 and 0.02, respectively).
Conclusions: Breast augmentation is associated with high patient satisfaction and significant improvements in quality of life. However, physicians should inform patients that submuscular augmentations are associated with a delay in recovery of physical functioning and be aware that older patients may experience diminished satisfaction and should counsel accordingly.
Clinical question/level of evidence: Therapeutic, IV.
Comment in
-
Limitations of the BREAST-Q as an outcomes measure for evaluation of breast augmentation patients.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Dec;134(6):986e-988e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000685. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014. PMID: 25415122 No abstract available.
-
Reply: The BREAST-Q as an outcomes measure for evaluation of breast augmentation patients.Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014 Dec;134(6):988e-989e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0000000000000659. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2014. PMID: 25415123 No abstract available.
References
-
- Chung KC, Swanson JA, Schmitz D, Sullivan D, Rohrich RJ. Introducing evidence-based medicine to plastic and reconstructive surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009;123:1385–1389
-
- Park AJ, Chetty U, Watson AC. Patient satisfaction following insertion of silicone breast implants. Br J Plast Surg. 1996;49:515–518
-
- Schlebusch L, Mahrt I. Long-term psychological sequelae of augmentation mammoplasty. S Afr Med J. 1993;83:267–271
-
- Young VL, Nemecek JR, Nemecek DA. The efficacy of breast augmentation: Breast size increase, patient satisfaction, and psychological effects. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1994;94:958–969
-
- Swanson E. Prospective outcome study of 225 cases of breast augmentation. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2013;131:1158–1166
Publication types
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical
Research Materials
