Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 May 13;110(10):2551-9.
doi: 10.1038/bjc.2014.161. Epub 2014 Mar 27.

The intratumoural subsite and relation of CD8(+) and FOXP3(+) T lymphocytes in colorectal cancer provide important prognostic clues

Affiliations
Comparative Study

The intratumoural subsite and relation of CD8(+) and FOXP3(+) T lymphocytes in colorectal cancer provide important prognostic clues

A Ling et al. Br J Cancer. .

Abstract

Background: To find improved tools for prognostic evaluation in patients with colorectal cancer (CRC), we have analysed how infiltration of cytotoxic T lymphocytes (CD8(+)) and regulatory T lymphocytes (FoxP3(+)) correlates to prognosis, not only according to quantity and relation, but also to subsite within tumours of different molecular characteristics (microsatellite instability and CpG island methylator phenotype status).

Methods: CD8 and FOXP3 expression was evaluated by immunohistochemistry in 426 archival tumour tissue samples from patients surgically resected for CRC. The average infiltration of CD8(+) and FOXP3(+) cells was assessed along the tumour invasive front, in the tumour centre and within the tumour epithelium (intraepithelial).

Results: We found that infiltration of CD8(+) T lymphocytes within the tumour epithelium provided the strongest prognostic information (P<0.001). At the tumour invasive front and tumour centre, FOXP3 expression withheld the strongest association to prognosis (P<0.001), suggesting FOXP3(+) T-lymphocyte infiltration to be a better prognostic tool than CD8(+) T lymphocytes at these intratumoural subsites. We further analysed the possible prognostic impact of the relation between these T-cell subsets, finding that a high intraepithelial CD8 expression was associated with a better patient outcome, independent of FOXP3 infiltration. In groups of low intraepithelial CD8 expression, however, a high infiltration rate of FOXP3(+) cells at the tumour invasive front, significantly improved prognosis.

Conclusions: Analyses of intraepithelial infiltration of CD8(+) T lymphocytes, infiltration of FOXP3(+) T lymphocytes at the tumour front or centre, and the relation between these subsets, may be a valuable tool for predicting prognosis in colon cancer.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Evaluation of immune marker expression at intratumoural subsites of colon carcinoma. Expression of CD8+ cells determined by immunohistochemistry at the invasive front, tumour centre and within the tumour epithelium (intraepithelial expression, indicated by arrows).
Figure 2
Figure 2
Cancer-specific survival in colon cancers. Cases scored (A) for expression of CD8 and FOXP3 total score: score 3–4 (low), 5–6 (moderate) or 7–12 (abundant) expression; or (B) at intratumoural subsites, CD8 IE (intraepithelial) and FOXP3 F (front), score 1–4: score 1 (no/sporadic), score 2 (moderate), score 3 (abundant) and score 4 (highly abundant). Shown are Kaplan–Meier plots. Log-rank tests were used to calculate P values.
Figure 3
Figure 3
Cancer-specific survival of colon cancers. Cases scored for the quotient of (A) the total score: score 3–4 (low), 5–6 (moderate) or 7–12 (abundant) of CD8/FOXP3 expression; or (B) CD8 IE/FOXP3 F, score 1–4: score 1 (no/sporadic), score 2 (moderate), score 3 (abundant) and score 4 (highly abundant). (C) Cancer-specific survival of cases scored for subgroups of CD8Lo, score 1–2; CD8Hi, score 3–4; FOXP3Lo, score 1–2; and FOXP3Hi, score 3–4. Shown are Kaplan–Meier plots. Log-rank tests were used to calculate P values.
Figure 4
Figure 4
Cancer-specific survival in subgroups of colon cancer arranged according to MSI screening status. Cases scored for CD8 IE or FOXP3 F expression, score 1–4: score 1 (no/sporadic), score 2 (moderate), score 3 (abundant) and score 4 (highly abundant). Shown are Kaplan–Meier plots of specimens of (A) MSI cases and (B) MSS cases. Log-rank tests were used to calculate P values.

References

    1. Boland CR, Thibodeau SN, Hamilton SR, Sidransky D, Eshleman JR, Burt RW, Meltzer SJ, Rodriguez-Bigas MA, Fodde R, Ranzani GN, Srivastava S. A National Cancer Institute Workshop on Microsatellite Instability for cancer detection and familial predisposition: development of international criteria for the determination of microsatellite instability in colorectal cancer. Cancer Res. 1998;58 (22:5248–5257. - PubMed
    1. Dahlin AM, Henriksson ML, Van Guelpen B, Stenling R, Oberg A, Rutegard J, Palmqvist R. Colorectal cancer prognosis depends on T-cell infiltration and molecular characteristics of the tumor. Mod Pathol. 2011;24 (5:671–682. - PubMed
    1. Dahlin AM, Palmqvist R, Henriksson ML, Jacobsson M, Eklof V, Rutegard J, Oberg A, Van Guelpen BR. The role of the CpG island methylator phenotype in colorectal cancer prognosis depends on microsatellite instability screening status. Clin Cancer Res. 2010;16 (6:1845–1855. - PubMed
    1. deLeeuw RJ, Kost SE, Kakal JA, Nelson BH. The prognostic value of FoxP3+ tumor-infiltrating lymphocytes in cancer: a critical review of the literature. Clin Cancer Res. 2012;18 (11:3022–3029. - PubMed
    1. Deschoolmeester V, Baay M, Lardon F, Pauwels P, Peeters M. Immune cells in colorectal cancer: prognostic relevance and role of MSI. Cancer Microenviron. 2011;4 (3:377–392. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms