Can I be sued for that? Liability risk and the disclosure of clinically significant genetic research findings
- PMID: 24676095
- PMCID: PMC4009601
- DOI: 10.1101/gr.170514.113
Can I be sued for that? Liability risk and the disclosure of clinically significant genetic research findings
Abstract
Genomic researchers increasingly are faced with difficult decisions about whether, under what circumstances, and how to return research results and significant incidental findings to study participants. Many have argued that there is an ethical-maybe even a legal-obligation to disclose significant findings under some circumstances. At the international level, over the last decade there has begun to emerge a clear legal obligation to return significant findings discovered during the course of research. However, there is no explicit legal duty to disclose in the United States. This creates legal uncertainty that may lead to unmanaged variation in practice and poor quality care. This article discusses liability risks associated with the disclosure of significant research findings for investigators in the United States.
Similar articles
-
The legal risks of returning results of genomics research.Genet Med. 2012 Apr;14(4):473-7. doi: 10.1038/gim.2012.10. Epub 2012 Feb 9. Genet Med. 2012. PMID: 22323070 Free PMC article.
-
Return of genomic results to research participants: the floor, the ceiling, and the choices in between.Am J Hum Genet. 2014 Jun 5;94(6):818-26. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2014.04.009. Epub 2014 May 8. Am J Hum Genet. 2014. PMID: 24814192 Free PMC article.
-
Primer on medical genomics. Part XIII: Ethical and regulatory issues.Mayo Clin Proc. 2004 May;79(5):645-50. doi: 10.4065/79.5.645. Mayo Clin Proc. 2004. PMID: 15132406 Review.
-
Duty to disclose in medical genetics: a legal perspective.Am J Med Genet. 1991 Jun 1;39(3):347-54. doi: 10.1002/ajmg.1320390320. Am J Med Genet. 1991. PMID: 1867289
-
Disclosure of incidental findings from next-generation sequencing in pediatric genomic research.Pediatrics. 2013 Mar;131(3):564-71. doi: 10.1542/peds.2012-0084. Epub 2013 Feb 11. Pediatrics. 2013. PMID: 23400601 Free PMC article. Review.
Cited by
-
Communicating BRCA research results to patients enrolled in international clinical trials: lessons learnt from the AGO-OVAR 16 study.BMC Med Ethics. 2016 Oct 21;17(1):63. doi: 10.1186/s12910-016-0144-y. BMC Med Ethics. 2016. PMID: 27769273 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
How should we address the inevitable harms from non-negligent variant reclassification in predictive genetic testing?J Genet Couns. 2023 Feb;32(1):18-30. doi: 10.1002/jgc4.1638. Epub 2022 Oct 19. J Genet Couns. 2023. PMID: 36260514 Free PMC article.
-
Returning actionable genomic results in a research biobank: Analytic validity, clinical implementation, and resource utilization.Am J Hum Genet. 2021 Dec 2;108(12):2224-2237. doi: 10.1016/j.ajhg.2021.10.005. Epub 2021 Nov 8. Am J Hum Genet. 2021. PMID: 34752750 Free PMC article.
-
Automatic Placement of Genomic Research Results in Medical Records: Do Researchers Have a Duty? Should Participants Have a Choice?J Law Med Ethics. 2015 Winter;43(4):827-42. doi: 10.1111/jlme.12323. J Law Med Ethics. 2015. PMID: 26711421 Free PMC article.
-
Recommendations for Treating Males: An Ethical Rationale for the Inclusion of Testicular Self-Examination (TSE) in a Standard of Care.Am J Mens Health. 2018 May;12(3):539-545. doi: 10.1177/1557988315620468. Epub 2015 Dec 3. Am J Mens Health. 2018. PMID: 26634857 Free PMC article.
References
-
- Adams v. Ison, 249 S.W. 2d 791 (Ky. 1952)
-
- American Jurisprudence, 2nd ed. 1972. Physicians and surgeons, Vol. 61, sec. 100.
-
- ANPRM (Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking). 2011. Federal Register, Vol. 76, No. 143.
-
- Bowman v. McPheeters, 77 Cal. App. 2d 795, 176 P. 2d 745 (1947)
-
- Bush LW, Rothenberg KH 2012. Dialogues, dilemmas, and disclosures: genomic research and incidental findings. Genet Med 14: 293–295 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources