Can I be sued for that? Liability risk and the disclosure of clinically significant genetic research findings
- PMID: 24676095
- PMCID: PMC4009601
- DOI: 10.1101/gr.170514.113
Can I be sued for that? Liability risk and the disclosure of clinically significant genetic research findings
Abstract
Genomic researchers increasingly are faced with difficult decisions about whether, under what circumstances, and how to return research results and significant incidental findings to study participants. Many have argued that there is an ethical-maybe even a legal-obligation to disclose significant findings under some circumstances. At the international level, over the last decade there has begun to emerge a clear legal obligation to return significant findings discovered during the course of research. However, there is no explicit legal duty to disclose in the United States. This creates legal uncertainty that may lead to unmanaged variation in practice and poor quality care. This article discusses liability risks associated with the disclosure of significant research findings for investigators in the United States.
References
-
- Adams v. Ison, 249 S.W. 2d 791 (Ky. 1952)
-
- American Jurisprudence, 2nd ed. 1972. Physicians and surgeons, Vol. 61, sec. 100.
-
- ANPRM (Advanced Notice of Proposed Rulemaking). 2011. Federal Register, Vol. 76, No. 143.
-
- Bowman v. McPheeters, 77 Cal. App. 2d 795, 176 P. 2d 745 (1947)
-
- Bush LW, Rothenberg KH 2012. Dialogues, dilemmas, and disclosures: genomic research and incidental findings. Genet Med 14: 293–295 - PubMed
Publication types
MeSH terms
Grants and funding
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources