Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2005 Nov;66(6):486-500.
doi: 10.1016/j.curtheres.2005.12.002.

Effects of the addition of high-dose vitamin C to polyethylene glycol solution for colonic cleansing: A pilot study in healthy volunteers

Affiliations

Effects of the addition of high-dose vitamin C to polyethylene glycol solution for colonic cleansing: A pilot study in healthy volunteers

Stéphane Mouly et al. Curr Ther Res Clin Exp. 2005 Nov.

Abstract

Background: Polyethylene glycol (PEG) solutions, with or without osmotic agents, are used to empty the large intestine before procedures such as colonoscopy or colonic surgery. Data concerning the effectiveness of vitamin C as an ingredient in colonic preparations are scant.

Objective: The aim of this article was to assess the effectiveness, acceptability, and tolerability of 6 preparations of a standard PEG electrolyte solution containing different doses of PEG, vitamin C (as an osmotic agent), and sodium sulfate in colonic cleansing.

Methods: This double-blind, randomized, 2-period crossover study was conducted at the Lariboisière Hospital, Paris, France. Healthy adult volunteers were randomly assigned to receive 2 of 6 colonic cleansing preparations, each containing different doses of PEG (100 or 125 g/L), vitamin C (0, 5, or 10 g/L, in the form of sodium ascorbate, ascorbic acid, or a mixture of both), and sodium sulfate (5 or 7.5 g/L), diluted in water to a volume of 2 L. Study drug administration was separated by a washout period of 7 to 15 days, after which the volunteers received an alternate preparation. Stools were collected for 10 hours after the start of solution ingestion. The primary efficacy end point was stool volume. Secondary end points included acceptability of taste, assessed using a 100-mm visual analog scale (VAS) (0 = excellent to 100 = execrable), taste criteria (saltiness, acidity, and sweetness, assessed on a 4-point Likert-type scale [0 = very pleasant to 3 = intolerable]) and tolerability (clinical effects [changes in body weight, blood pressure, heart rate, and nausea and vomiting] and biologic effects [changes in serum electrolytes, creatinine, hematocrit, and ascorbic acid]).

Results: Thirty volunteers (15 men, 15 women; mean [SD] age, 29.8 [8.2] years [range, 20-45 years]) were enrolled and completed the study. Mean (SD) stool volume obtained with preparations containing 10 g/L of vitamin C did not differ significantly from the volume obtained without vitamin C (2.54 [0.54] L vs 1.93 [0.62] L; 95% CI, -0.13 to 1.47). Mean (SD) VAS scores for acceptability of taste ranged from 54.4 (25.0) (preparation E) to 74.4 (20.1) (preparation C) (P = 0.03 preparation E vs all other preparations). The only significant difference in taste criteria was in acidity, with preparation A being the least acidic according to patients' ratings on the VAS (1.4 [0.7] vs 1.8 [0.4] [mean of the other 5 preparations combined]; P = 0.04 preparation A vs all other preparations). Mild dehydration occurred in 6 subjects (1 for each preparation). No clinical or biological adverse effects were found.

Conclusions: In this study of 6 colonic cleansing preparations in healthy volunteers, the use of high-dose vitamin C as an osmotic agent in addition to PEG did not significantly increase stool output. All 6 preparations were well tolerated.

Keywords: acceptability; ascorbate; ascorbic acid; colonic preparation; polyethylene glycol solution; stool output; taste; vitamin C.

PubMed Disclaimer

References

    1. Ransohoff D.F., Sandler R.S. Clinical practice. Screening for colorectal cancer. N Engl J Med. 2002;346:40–44. - PubMed
    1. Toledo T.K., DiPalma J.A. Review article: Colon cleansing preparation for gastrointestinal procedures. Aliment Pharmacol Ther. 2001;15:605–611. - PubMed
    1. Kastenberg D., Chasen R., Choudhary C. Efficacy and safety of sodium phosphate tablets compared with PEG solution in colon cleansing: Two identically designed, randomized, controlled, parallel group, multicenter phase III trials. Gastrointest Endosc. 2001;54:705–713. - PubMed
    1. Lapalus M.G., Gaudin J.L., Lemkecher T. Prospective randomized single-blind trial comparing oral sodium phosphate with polyethylene glycol for colonoscopy preparation [in French] Gastroenterol Clin Biol. 2001;25:29–34. - PubMed
    1. Tooson J.D., Gates L.K., Jr. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Choosing the best lavage regimen. Postgrad Med. 1996;100:203–204. - PubMed
    2. Tooson J.D., Gates L.K., Jr. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Choosing the best lavage regimen. Postgrad Med. 1996;100:207–212. - PubMed
    3. Tooson J.D., Gates L.K., Jr. Bowel preparation before colonoscopy. Choosing the best lavage regimen. Postgrad Med. 1996;100:214. - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources