Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Review
. 2014 Jan;8(1):19-25.
doi: 10.4103/0973-6247.126683.

Hepatitis C virus: Screening, diagnosis, and interpretation of laboratory assays

Affiliations
Review

Hepatitis C virus: Screening, diagnosis, and interpretation of laboratory assays

Ekta Gupta et al. Asian J Transfus Sci. 2014 Jan.

Abstract

An estimated 3% of the world population is infected with Hepatitis C virus (HCV), a hepatotropic RNA virus, transmitted primarily via the blood route. The major modes of transmission of the virus include injection drug use, unsafe injection practices, blood transfusion etc. HCV causes chronic hepatitis in about 80% of those infected by it. The mainstay in diagnosing infection with HCV is to initially screen high risk groups for antibodies to HCV (anti-HCV). The inclusion of serum to cut-off ratio (S/CO) in recent guidelines is helpful in deciding the supplemental assay to be used to confirm initially reactive screening results. Nucleic acid amplification tests (NAT) are used as confirmatory tools, and also to determine viral load prior to initiating treatment. Quantitative NAT has replaced qualitative assays. Genotyping is an important tool in clinical management to predict the likelihood of response and determine the optimal duration of therapy. The impact of this infection has begun to emerge in India. The problem of professional blood donation despite an existing law against it, and flourishing unsafe injection practices, are potential sources for the spread of hepatitis C in our country. All health care practitioners need to understand how to establish or exclude a diagnosis of HCV infection and to interpret the tests correctly. In the absence of a preventive or therapeutic vaccine, and also of post-exposure prophylaxis against the virus, it is imperative to diagnose infection by HCV so as to prevent hepatic insult and the ensuing complications that follow, including primary hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). This review aims to help blood bank staff regarding options for diagnosis and management of donors positive for HCV.

Keywords: Blood borne virus; hepatitis C virus diagnosis; nucleic acid test.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Conflicting Interest: None declared.

Figures

Figure 1
Figure 1
Natural history following infection with hepatitis C virus
Figure 2
Figure 2
Algorithm for donor counseling for HCV positive donors

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Forman MS, Valsamakis A. Hepatitis C virus. In: Versalovic J, Carrol KC, Funke G, Jorgensen JH, Landry ML, Warrock DW, editors. Murray's Manual of Clinical Microbiology. 10th ed. Washington: American Society of Microbiology Press; 2011. pp. 1437–55.
    1. Alter MJ. Epidemiology of hepatitis C virus infection. World J Gastroenterol. 2007;13:2436–41. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Alter MJ, Seeff LB, Bacon BR, Thomas DL, Rigsby MO, Di Bisceglie AM. Testing for hepatitis C virus infection should be routine for persons at increased risk for infection. Ann Intern Med. 2004;141:715–7. - PubMed
    1. Ghany MG, Strader DB, Thomas DL, Seeff LB. American association for the study of liver diseases. Diagnosis, management, and treatment of hepatitis C: An update. Hepatology. 2009;49:1335–74. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Feinstone SM, Kapikian AZ, Purcell RH, Alter HJ, Holland PV. Transfusion-associated hepatitis not due to viral hepatitis type A or B. N Engl J Med. 1975;292:767–70. - PubMed