Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Feb 5;5(3):227.
doi: 10.5210/ojphi.v5i3.4847. eCollection 2014.

Experience of using information systems in public health practice: findings from a qualitative study

Affiliations

Experience of using information systems in public health practice: findings from a qualitative study

Joshua R Vest et al. Online J Public Health Inform. .

Abstract

Objective: Data collection and management by local health departments (LHDs) is a complex endeavor, complicated by system level and organizational factors. The purpose of this study was to describe the processes and use of information systems (IS) utilized for data collection, management, and sharing by LHD employees.

Methods: We interviewed a purposive sample of 12 staff working in the key public health practice areas of communicable disease control, immunizations, and vital records from three LHDs in different states. Our interview questions addressed job descriptions, daily activities, and the use and perceptions of both data and IS in support of their work. A content analytic approach was used to derive themes and categories common across programmatic areas.

Results: Local public health involves the use of mix of state-supplied and locally implemented IS supported by paper records. Additionally, each LHD in this study used at least one shadow system to maintain a duplicate set of information. Experiences with IS functionality and the extent to which it supported work varied by programmatic area, but inefficiencies, challenges in generating reports, limited data accessibility, and workarounds were commonly reported.

Conclusions: Current approaches to data management and sharing do not always support efficient public health practice or allow data to be used for organizational and community decision making. Many of the challenges to effective and efficient public health work were not solely technological. These findings suggest the need for interorganizational collaboration, increasing organizational capacity, workflow redesign, and end user training.

Keywords: Public Health Informatics; immunization; information systems; public health administration; vital statistics.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare, financial or otherwise.

Similar articles

Cited by

References

    1. Lee LM, Thacker SB. 2011. The cornerstone of public health practice: public health surveillance, 1961--2011. MMWR Surveill Summ. 60(Suppl 4), 15-21 - PubMed
    1. Schauer SL, et al. 2009. The use of an immunization information system to establish baseline childhood immunization rates and measure contract objectives. J Public Health Manag Pract. 15(5), E6-12 10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181a391ba - DOI - PubMed
    1. Groom H, et al. 2010. Qualitative Analysis of Immunization Programs With Most Improved Childhood Vaccination Coverage From 2001 to 2004. J Public Health Manag Pract. 16(1), E1-8. .10.1097/PHH.0b013e3181b0b8bc - DOI - PubMed
    1. Derose SF, et al. 2003. Developing quality indicators for local health departments: experience in Los Angeles County. Am J Prev Med. 25(4), 347-57 10.1016/S0749-3797(03)00208-3 - DOI - PubMed
    1. Rutherford GW, et al. 2010. Public health triangulation: approach and application to synthesizing data to understand national and local HIV epidemics. BMC Public Health. 10(1), 447 10.1186/1471-2458-10-447 - DOI - PMC - PubMed

LinkOut - more resources