Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: practice and opinions about the use of IUDs in nulliparous women, adolescents and other patient populations
- PMID: 24679477
- DOI: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.02.008
Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: practice and opinions about the use of IUDs in nulliparous women, adolescents and other patient populations
Abstract
Objectives: Use of intrauterine devices (IUDs) by US women is low despite their suitability for most women of reproductive age and in a variety of clinical contexts. This study examined obstetrician-gynecologists' practices and opinions about the use of IUDs in adolescents, nulliparous women and other patient groups, as well as for emergency contraception.
Design: A survey questionnaire was sent to a computer-generated sample of 3000 fellows who were reflective of the American College of Obstetricians and Gynecologists (College) membership.
Results: After exclusions from the 1552 returned surveys (51.7% response rate), 1150 eligible questionnaires were analyzed. Almost all obstetrician-gynecologists (95.8%) reported providing IUDs, but only 66.8% considered nulliparous women, and 43.0% considered adolescents appropriate candidates. Even among obstetrician-gynecologists who recalled reading a College publication about IUDs, only 78.0% and 45.0% considered nulliparous women and adolescents appropriate candidates, respectively. Few respondents (16.1%) had recommended the copper IUD as emergency contraception, and only 73.9% agreed that the copper IUD could be used as emergency contraception. A total of 67.3% of respondents agreed that an IUD can be inserted immediately after an abortion or miscarriage. Fewer (43.5%) agreed that an IUD can be inserted immediately postpartum, and very few provide these services (11.4% and 7.2%, respectively). Staying informed about practice recommendations for long-acting reversible contraception was associated with broader provision of IUDs.
Conclusions: Although most obstetrician-gynecologists offer IUDs, many exclude appropriate candidates for IUD use, both for emergency contraception and for long-term use, despite evidence-based recommendations.
Implications: This study shows that obstetrician-gynecologists still do not offer IUDs to appropriate candidates, such as nulliparous women and adolescents, and rarely provide the copper IUD as emergency contraception.
Keywords: Adolescents; Emergency contraception; Intrauterine contraceptive device (IUD); Long-acting reversible contraception; Nulliparous; Obstetrician–Gynecologists; Postabortion; Postpartum.
Copyright © 2014 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Similar articles
-
Obstetrician-gynecologists and contraception: long-acting reversible contraception practices and education.Contraception. 2014 Jun;89(6):578-83. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2014.02.004. Epub 2014 Feb 18. Contraception. 2014. PMID: 24656553
-
Implementing best practices for the provision of long-acting reversible contraception: a survey of obstetrician-gynecologists.Contraception. 2019 Aug;100(2):123-127. doi: 10.1016/j.contraception.2019.03.053. Epub 2019 Apr 11. Contraception. 2019. PMID: 30981843
-
Obstetrician-gynecologists and the intrauterine device: a survey of attitudes and practice.Obstet Gynecol. 2002 Feb;99(2):275-80. doi: 10.1016/s0029-7844(01)01726-4. Obstet Gynecol. 2002. PMID: 11814509
-
Progestin intrauterine devices versus copper intrauterine devices for emergency contraception.Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023 Feb 27;2(2):CD013744. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013744.pub2. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2023. PMID: 36847591 Free PMC article.
-
A clinical guideline for intrauterine device use in adolescents.J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2012 Aug;24(8):453-62. doi: 10.1111/j.1745-7599.2012.00753.x. Epub 2012 Jul 12. J Am Acad Nurse Pract. 2012. PMID: 22845027 Review.
Cited by
-
Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Counseling and Use for Older Adolescents and Nulliparous Women.J Adolesc Health. 2016 Dec;59(6):703-709. doi: 10.1016/j.jadohealth.2016.07.018. Epub 2016 Sep 21. J Adolesc Health. 2016. PMID: 27665153 Free PMC article. Clinical Trial.
-
Adherence to Recommended Practices for Provision of Long-Acting Reversible Contraception Among Providers in a Large U.S. Health Care System.J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020 Dec;29(12):1586-1595. doi: 10.1089/jwh.2019.8169. Epub 2020 Jul 13. J Womens Health (Larchmt). 2020. PMID: 32667847 Free PMC article.
-
The Use of ACOG Guidelines: Perceived Contraindications to IUD and Implant Use Among Family Planning Providers.Matern Child Health J. 2017 Sep;21(9):1706-1712. doi: 10.1007/s10995-017-2320-1. Matern Child Health J. 2017. PMID: 28707101
-
Levonorgestrel-Releasing Intrauterine System as a Contraceptive Method in Nulliparous Women: A Systematic Review.J Clin Med. 2020 Jul 3;9(7):2101. doi: 10.3390/jcm9072101. J Clin Med. 2020. PMID: 32635369 Free PMC article. Review.
-
Provider bias and family planning in Upper Egypt: a simulated client approach.J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2023 Oct 1;98(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s42506-023-00144-6. J Egypt Public Health Assoc. 2023. PMID: 37777657 Free PMC article.
MeSH terms
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources
Medical