Necessity of temporary epicardial pacing wires after surgery for congenital heart disease

Abstract

Background: Temporary epicardial pacing wires are commonly placed in patients undergoing surgery for congenital heart disease. Though often helpful, these wires are not without risk. We aimed to identify characteristics that would obviate placement of temporary epicardial pacing wires in this patient population.

Methods: A prospective observational study was performed on patients admitted to the pediatric intensive care unit after surgery for congenital heart disease between October 2011 and October 2012. Logistic regression analysis was performed to identify independent predictors of patients in whom wires were not helpful postoperatively.

Results: Wires were placed in 213 of 249 patients. Wires were helpful in 50 patients; 23 for diagnostic purposes only, 17 for therapeutic purposes only, and 10 for both. On logistic regression analysis, absence of intraoperative arrhythmias (p < 0.01), lower arteriovenous O2 difference (p < 0.01), and shorter duration of cardiopulmonary bypass (p = 0.050) were significant predictors of patients in whom wires were not helpful postoperatively. Further, the predicted probability based on logistic regression model using these 3 variables correctly identified 93% of patients who did not need pacing wires. Four complications (1.9%) related to wires occurred, including 1 episode of life-threatening bleeding that was found, during emergent exploration, to be due to atrial perforation at the wire insertion site.

Conclusions: Temporary epicardial pacing wires are not necessary in many patients recovering from surgery for congenital heart disease. A conservative approach to their use may therefore be warranted.