Immune and stress mediators in response to bilateral adnexectomy: comparison of single-port access and conventional laparoscopy in a porcine model
- PMID: 24681233
- DOI: 10.1016/j.jmig.2014.03.015
Immune and stress mediators in response to bilateral adnexectomy: comparison of single-port access and conventional laparoscopy in a porcine model
Abstract
Study objective: To evaluate systemic markers of immune and stress responses after bilateral adnexectomy performed using 2 different laparoscopic techniques in pigs.
Design: Prospective comparative study (Canadian Task Force classification II-2).
Setting: University teaching hospital, research hospital, and tertiary care center.
Animals: Twenty female Yorkshire pigs undergoing laparoscopic surgery.
Interventions: Animals underwent bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy (ovary and fallopian tube extraction), performed via conventional laparoscopy (n = 10) or the single-port access approach (n = 10).
Measurements and main results: Injury provokes an acute-phase response, primarily produced by cytokines. The inflammatory response has been well described for major surgery and for conventional laparoscopy; however, little information is currently available for single-port laparoscopy, and none in the gynecologic field. This is the first study to compare serum cytokine interleukin 6 (IL-6) and tumor necrosis factor alpha (TNF-α) concentrations at baseline and in the early postoperative period (2, 4, and 20 hours) after bilateral salpingo-oophorectomy performed via conventional laparoscopy (n = 10) or single-port access (n = 10) in a porcine model. The stress response was measured using glucose and cortisol concentrations and the animals' response to surgery via a 6-category observation-based behavior test. Both IL-6 and TNF-α concentrations peaked at 4 hours after surgery, and were significantly lower in the single-port access group (p = .02) than in the conventional laparoscopy group (p = .02). In addition, in the single-port access group, concentrations of stress markers were slightly lower at all intervals recorded and were statistically significant at 2 hours after the operation for glucose concentration (mean [SD], 164.50 [26.73] mg/dL for conventional laparoscopy vs 86.50 [17.93] mg/dL for single-port access; p = .02).
Conclusion: Evidence of improved inflammatory and stress responses was recorded in the minimally invasive single-port group. More clinical investigations are needed to further study the applicability of single-port access laparoscopy in gynecologic surgery.
Keywords: Animal model; Bilateral adnexectomy; Immune and stress response; Laparoscopy; Single-port access.
Copyright © 2014 AAGL. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Publication types
MeSH terms
Substances
LinkOut - more resources
Full Text Sources
Other Literature Sources