Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
Comparative Study
. 2014 May;25(3):323-30.
doi: 10.1097/EDE.0000000000000092.

Meat intake and reproductive parameters among young men

Affiliations
Comparative Study

Meat intake and reproductive parameters among young men

Myriam C Afeiche et al. Epidemiology. 2014 May.

Abstract

Background: In the United States, anabolic sex steroids are administered to cattle for growth promotion. There is concern regarding the reproductive consequences of this practice in men who eat beef. We investigated whether meat consumption was associated with semen quality parameters and reproductive hormone levels in young men.

Methods: Semen samples were obtained from 189 men aged 18-22 years. Diet was assessed with a previously validated food frequency questionnaire. We used linear regression to analyze the cross-sectional associations of meat intake with semen quality parameters and reproductive hormones while adjusting for potential confounders.

Results: There was an inverse relation between processed red meat intake and total sperm count. The adjusted relative differences in total sperm counts for men in increasing quartiles of processed meat intake were 0 (ref), -3 (95% confidence interval = -67 to 37), -14 (-82 to 28), and -78 (-202 to -5) million (test for trend, P = 0.01). This association was strongest among men with abstinence time less than 2 days and was driven by a strong inverse relation between processed red meat intake and ejaculate volume (test for trend, P = 0.003).

Conclusions: In our population of young men, processed meat intake was associated with lower total sperm count. We cannot distinguish whether this association is because of residual confounding by abstinence time or represents a true biological effect.

PubMed Disclaimer

Figures

Figure
Figure. Processed meat intake quartiles in relation to (A) total sperm count (millions) and (B) total progressive motile count (million motile). Meat intake quartiles: Q1 = 0 - 0.42mL; Q2 = 0.44 – 0.85 mL; Q3 = 0.87 – 1.44mL; Q4 = 1.45 – 5.25mL
Models are adjusted for age, abstinence time, race, smoking status, BMI, recruitment period, moderate-to-intense exercise, TV-watching, dietary patterns, and total calorie intake. Tests for trend were conducted across quartiles using a variable with the median processed meat intake in each quartile as a continuous variable in the linear regression models. for total sperm count, P =0.01; for total progressive motile count, P = 0.02.

References

    1. Andersson A, Skakkebaek N. Exposure to exogenous estrogens in food: possible impact on human development and health. European Journal of Endocrinology. 1999;140(6):477–485. - PubMed
    1. Daxenberger A, Ibarreta D, Meyer HHD. Possible health impact of animal oestrogens in food. Human Reproduction Update. 2001;7(3):340–355. - PubMed
    1. Willingham EJ. Environmental Review: Trenbolone and Other Cattle Growth Promoters: Need for a New Risk-Assessment Framework. Environmental Practice. 2006;8(01):58–65.
    1. Swan SH, Liu F, Overstreet JW, Brazil C, Skakkebaek NE. Semen quality of fertile US males in relation to their mothers' beef consumption during pregnancy. Hum Reprod. 2007;22(6):1497–1502. - PubMed
    1. Sharpe RM. Environmental/lifestyle effects on spermatogenesis. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences. 2010;365(1546):1697–1712. - PMC - PubMed

Publication types

MeSH terms