Skip to main page content
U.S. flag

An official website of the United States government

Dot gov

The .gov means it’s official.
Federal government websites often end in .gov or .mil. Before sharing sensitive information, make sure you’re on a federal government site.

Https

The site is secure.
The https:// ensures that you are connecting to the official website and that any information you provide is encrypted and transmitted securely.

Access keys NCBI Homepage MyNCBI Homepage Main Content Main Navigation
. 2014 Dec;71(12):855-64.
doi: 10.1136/oemed-2013-101801. Epub 2014 Mar 28.

Identifying gender differences in reported occupational information from three US population-based case-control studies

Affiliations

Identifying gender differences in reported occupational information from three US population-based case-control studies

Sarah J Locke et al. Occup Environ Med. 2014 Dec.

Abstract

Objectives: Growing evidence suggests that gender-blind assessment of exposure may introduce exposure misclassification, but few studies have characterised gender differences across occupations and industries. We pooled control responses to job-specific, industry-specific and exposure-specific questionnaires (modules) that asked detailed questions about work activities from three US population-based case-control studies to examine gender differences in work tasks and their frequencies.

Methods: We calculated the ratio of female-to-male controls that completed each module. For four job modules (assembly worker, machinist, health professional, janitor/cleaner) and for subgroups of jobs that completed those modules, we evaluated gender differences in task prevalence and frequency using χ(2) and Mann-Whitney U tests, respectively.

Results: The 1360 female and 2245 male controls reported 6033 and 12 083 jobs, respectively. Gender differences in female:male module completion ratios were observed for 39 of 45 modules completed by ≥20 controls. Gender differences in task prevalence varied in direction and magnitude. For example, female janitors were significantly more likely to polish furniture (79% vs 44%), while male janitors were more likely to strip floors (73% vs 50%). Women usually reported more time spent on tasks than men. For example, the median hours per week spent degreasing for production workers in product manufacturing industries was 6.3 for women and 3.0 for men.

Conclusions: Observed gender differences may reflect actual differences in tasks performed or differences in recall, reporting or perception, all of which contribute to exposure misclassification and impact relative risk estimates. Our findings reinforce the need to capture subject-specific information on work tasks.

Keywords: case-control studies; occupational exposure; occupational health; population-based studies.

PubMed Disclaimer

Conflict of interest statement

Competing interests None.

References

    1. Kennedy SM, Koehoorn M. Exposure assessment in epidemiology: does gender matter? Am J Ind Med. 2003;44:576–583. - PubMed
    1. Quinn MM. Why do women and men have different occupational exposures? Occup Environ Med. 2011;68:861–862. - PubMed
    1. Messing K, Stellman JM. Sex, gender and women’s occupational health: The importance of considering mechanism. Environ Res. 2006;101:149–162. - PubMed
    1. Artazcoz L, Borrell C, Cortes I, et al. Occupational epidemiology and work related inequalities in health: a gender perspective for two complementary approaches to work and health research. J Epidemiol Community Health. 2007;61:39–45. - PMC - PubMed
    1. Burchell B, Fagan C, O’Brien C, et al. Working conditions in the European Union: the gender perspective. Luxembourg: European Foundation for the Improvement of Living and Working Conditions; 2007.

Publication types